From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 23:33:14 +0000
Subject: [U-Boot] ACPI in general
References: <AM4PR0401MB17325941465966FB6B90FDCF9AC50@AM4PR0401MB1732.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAPnjgZ1+f=T9v39Xtr_nCH+VpgOv2YDjiNy3dAqurzuCCMLnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOZdJXVmDbrUOBD8TJJfRnAs+r8A-9iCfBGR0vCTONDCOB9Kpw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB1732BB898EC986F51154BFCA9AC40@AM4PR0401MB1732.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 10/05/2016 04:15 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Is there any activity to bring ACPI to other than x86 arch? If not, do
>>> we have a plan to do so?
>>
>> Not that I know of, sorry.
>
> Note that ACPI for ARM exists on Linux already, and as far as I know,
> all ARM ACPI systems use UEFI, not U-Boot.
>

Exactly the reason I asked. Wondering if U-Boot is going down this path.

York