All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 方统浩50450 <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
	arybchenko@solarflare.com,  dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org,
	cunming.liang@intel.com, jia.guo@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix secondary process change share memory
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:02:42 +0800 (GMT+08:00)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ANYA0gD2CB3gOKTferEYwqrw.3.1578884562470.Hmail.fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110073215.09ad9a6f@hermes.lan>

secondary process will enter rte_eth_copy_pci_info function when initializing.
rte_eth_dev_pci_copy_info -> rte_eth_copy_pci_info




发件人：Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
发送日期：2020-01-10 23:32:15
收件人：Fang TongHao <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn>
抄送人：thomas@monjalon.net,ferruh.yigit@intel.com,arybchenko@solarflare.com,dev@dpdk.org,stable@dpdk.org,cunming.liang@intel.com,jia.guo@intel.com
主题：Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix secondary process change share memory>On Thu,  9 Jan 2020 11:14:25 +0800
>Fang TongHao <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn> wrote:
>
>> Hi all，I am from Sangfor Tech.I found a bug when using DPDK in
>> multiprocess scenario.The secondary process enters
>> "rte_eth_dev_pci_copy_info" function when initializing.Then it
>> sets the value of struct "rte_eth_dev_data.dev_flags" to zero,
>> but this struct is shared by primary process and secondary
>> process, and the value change is unexpected by primary process.
>> This may cause very serious damage.I think
>> the secondary process should not enter "rte_eth_dev_pci_copy_info"
>> function or changes the value of struct "rte_eth_dev_data.dev_flags"
>> in shared memory.
>> I fixed this bug by adding an if-statement to forbid the secondary
>> process changing the above-mentioned value.
>> Thansk, All.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fang TongHao <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn>
>
>Most of the drivers avoid calling rte_eth_dev_pci_copy_info
>in the secondary process, which one are you using?





  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09  3:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix secondary process change share memory Fang TongHao
2020-01-10 15:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-13  3:02   ` 方统浩50450 [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-09 12:27 Fang TongHao
2020-01-10  7:30 ` Jeff Guo
2020-01-10  7:53   ` 方统浩50450
2020-01-09  2:35 Fang TongHao
2020-01-15 10:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ANYA0gD2CB3gOKTferEYwqrw.3.1578884562470.Hmail.fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn \
    --to=fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.