From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mcnamara, John" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:52:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1450704384-9986-2-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1455114792-1603-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1877379.9acYIlBRDX@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBC85963 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:56:31 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1877379.9acYIlBRDX@xps13> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:12 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers >=20 > ... > > I liked the idea of Bruce of renaming these constants to *_YEAR and > *_MONTH. > I also think RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL should be RTE_VER_MINOR. > And maybe that RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE should be RTE_VER_RELEASE. >=20 > It shouldn't hurt applications as they must use RTE_VERSION and > rte_version(). >=20 > Opinions? That seems like a good change. I'll resubmit. John. --=20