Re: [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with macros

["Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 2:42 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto: normalize cryptodev pmd names with
> macros
> 
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:40:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-07-08 08:17, Neil Horman:
> > > I suppose thats fine, sure, though I'm really not comfortable with
> > > an open source project requiring what appears to be non-open source
> > > components (though I can't really tell what the snow3g or kasumi
> license is).
> >
> > Yes you're right.
> > IMHO, it is acceptable because it is free (just need a registration)
> > but it can be discussed.
> > I think there are some legal export issues because of crypto aim.
> Yeah, crypto usually has munitions export restrictions.  I'm fine with
> that, as long as the license to the code is GPL.  And I can't tell what
> the license is because you have to register to get it before you can see
> it.
> 
> If you, or someone can confirm that the snow3g and kasumi ssl libraries
> are open source compatible (or better still if the license can be
> announced prior to registration on the web site), then I'm fine with it,
> and am happy to test with it, I just don't want to register without
> knowing that beforehand.

Hi Neil,

The license is "Intel Pre-Release Software License Agreement". We will send a
patch to make this this clear in the documentation. We will also see if it
can be made visible on the download page. 

I can send you a copy of the license if you wish. Pablo has already tested 
compilation with the latest version of the patch.

John