From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:46429 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbcISIyb (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 04:54:31 -0400 From: "Otcheretianski, Andrei" To: Arend Van Spriel , Luca Coelho , "johannes@sipsolutions.net" CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "Beker, Ayala" , "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , "Coelho, Luciano" Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/9] cfg80211: Provide an API to report NAN function termination Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:54:25 +0000 Message-ID: (sfid-20160919_105435_456028_6DCB51E4) References: <20160916083321.5840-1-luca@coelho.fi> <20160916083321.5840-7-luca@coelho.fi> <66d12a94-4d7b-eadc-8ee2-b55ab8239296@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <66d12a94-4d7b-eadc-8ee2-b55ab8239296@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Arend Van Spriel [mailto:arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 23:00 > To: Luca Coelho ; johannes@sipsolutions.net > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Beker, Ayala ; > Otcheretianski, Andrei ; Grumbach, > Emmanuel ; Coelho, Luciano > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] cfg80211: Provide an API to report NAN function > termination > > On 18-9-2016 21:56, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > > On 16-9-2016 10:33, Luca Coelho wrote: > >> From: Ayala Beker > >> > >> Provide a function that reports NAN DE function termination. The > >> function may be terminated due to one of the following reasons: user > >> request, ttl expiration or failure. > >> If the NAN instance is tied to the owner, the notification will be > >> sent to the socket that started the NAN interface only > > > > So the driver is supposed to use this function from the .rm_nan_func > > callback (or .del_nan_func). How should the driver use this together > > with cfg80211_free_nan_func() function. > > Hit Send button too fast. Would it make sense to free the nan func implicitly > in cfg80211_nan_func_terminated() function or would there be reasons to > keep it. Currently when the NAN interface is stopped (ieee80211_do_stop) the termination notification can't be sent, since ieee80211_vif_to_wdev will return NULL after SDATA_STATE_RUNNING bit is cleared. I guess it's similar not only for mac80211, and in case of interface removal we don't really want to send notifications for each function. > > Regards, > Arend