Hello Alexander,

 

Did a quick test and it seems the rpm packaging classes don’t have this issue. The rootfs_deb bbclass however has the same lock files like with rootfs_ipk.

Should I try to patch this too to keep them aligned?

 

Kind regards,

Michael

 

-- 

BMW Car IT GmbH
Michael Ho
Spezialist Entwicklung – Build and Release Engineering
Lise-Meitner-Straße 14
89081 Ulm

Tel.: ­+49-731-37804-071

Mobil: +49-152-54980-471
Fax: +49-731-37804-001
Mail: 
michael.ho@bmw-carit.de 
Web: 
http://www.bmw-carit.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
BMW Car IT GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Kai-Uwe Balszuweit und
 Michael Böttrich
Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 11. January 2021 at 13:46
To: "Ho Michael, JC-3UL" <Michael.Ho@bmw.de>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: allow do_populate_sdk in parallel to do_rootfs

 

Does deb/rpm packaging already have this feature?

 

Alex

 

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 13:45, Michael Ho <Michael.Ho@bmw.de> wrote:

From: Michael Ho <Michael.Ho@bmw.de>

Switch do_populate_sdk for the ipk package manager to use a separate target
opkg config file and separate the lockfiles restricting do_rootfs and
do_populate_sdk from running in parallel.

This way if an image recipe includes a dependency to do_populate_sdk by
default then it will run in parallel to do_rootfs saving time compared to the
sequential execution.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ho <Michael.Ho@bmw.de>
---
 meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass       | 1 +
 meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass        | 4 ++--
 meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
index 79cb36c..d31dba0 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ IMAGE_PKGTYPE ?= "ipk"

 IPKGCONF_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg.conf"
 IPKGCONF_SDK =  "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk.conf"
+IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk-target.conf"

 PKGWRITEDIRIPK = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-ipks"

diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
index f1e0219..245c256 100644
--- a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_ipk do_package_qa"
 do_rootfs[vardeps] += "PACKAGE_FEED_URIS PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS"

 do_rootfs[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
-do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
-do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
+do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock"
+do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock"

 OPKG_PREPROCESS_COMMANDS = ""

diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
index 37af034..e2ca415 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
@@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ class PkgSdk(Sdk):
     def __init__(self, d, manifest_dir=None):
         super(PkgSdk, self).__init__(d, manifest_dir)

+        # In sdk_list_installed_packages the call to opkg is hardcoded to
+        # always use IPKGCONF_TARGET and there's no exposed API to change this
+        # so simply override IPKGCONF_TARGET to use this separated config file.
+        ipkgconf_sdk_target = d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET")
+        d.setVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET", ipkgconf_sdk_target)
+
         self.target_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET")
         self.host_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK")

--
2.7.4