> On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Think of crypto policy point of view
> 
> why not. this is probably a good thing. But I don't think we should
> block the current patches as they are. If we want to add a
> DISTRO_FEATURES the patches we did in mesa and xserver are needed
> anyways. Once every possible 'crypto' config are available as
> PACKAGECONFIG we simply need to add one line to pick the one we need
> based on DISTRO_FEATURE content. So I think we should merge them, and
> discuss/plan how to add crypto as a distro policy.

Thats ok. However, if there is a time to do something to consolidate crypto backend
policy then such instances are the right one. I know you have a solution for your problem.