From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753465Ab1GEFfU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 01:35:20 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:57793 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752717Ab1GEFfR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 01:35:17 -0400 From: "Nori, Sekhar" To: "Grosen, Mark" , Sergei Shtylyov CC: Ohad Ben-Cohen , davinci-linux-open-source , Arnd Bergmann , Brian Swetland , Rusty Russell , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:04:59 +0530 Subject: RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation Thread-Topic: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation Thread-Index: AQHML+P0Hfr3a08OpEW7Q/TK8TF6jpTLaEUAgAB6tVCAARO0AIAACGCAgASPneCAC7rrwA== Message-ID: References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-6-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <4E035B78.3080200@mvista.com> <4E04A9AE.3030801@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 00:01:41, Grosen, Mark wrote: > > From: Nori, Sekhar > > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:44 AM > > > > Hi Mark, > > Sekhar, thanks for your feedback and ideas. Comments below. > > Mark > > > Since procedure to set the boot address varies across DaVinci > > platforms, you could have a callback populated in platform data > > which will be implemented differently for original DaVinci and > > DA8xx devices. > > I looked at DM6467 and it's the same as OMAPL13x, except at a different > address. Rather than a callback, it could be just an address in the > platform data. Sounds okay as long as _all_ the DaVinci devices have the same bit to be set. Plus, I hope there are no other users of the register so that there is no race with other platform code using the same register. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nori, Sekhar" Subject: RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:04:59 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-6-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <4E035B78.3080200@mvista.com> <4E04A9AE.3030801@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Grosen, Mark" , Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , davinci-linux-open-source , Arnd Bergmann , Brian Swetland , Rusty Russell , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 00:01:41, Grosen, Mark wrote: > > From: Nori, Sekhar > > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:44 AM > > > > Hi Mark, > > Sekhar, thanks for your feedback and ideas. Comments below. > > Mark > > > Since procedure to set the boot address varies across DaVinci > > platforms, you could have a callback populated in platform data > > which will be implemented differently for original DaVinci and > > DA8xx devices. > > I looked at DM6467 and it's the same as OMAPL13x, except at a different > address. Rather than a callback, it could be just an address in the > platform data. Sounds okay as long as _all_ the DaVinci devices have the same bit to be set. Plus, I hope there are no other users of the register so that there is no race with other platform code using the same register. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Nori, Sekhar) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:04:59 +0530 Subject: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation In-Reply-To: References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-6-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <4E035B78.3080200@mvista.com> <4E04A9AE.3030801@mvista.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 00:01:41, Grosen, Mark wrote: > > From: Nori, Sekhar > > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:44 AM > > > > Hi Mark, > > Sekhar, thanks for your feedback and ideas. Comments below. > > Mark > > > Since procedure to set the boot address varies across DaVinci > > platforms, you could have a callback populated in platform data > > which will be implemented differently for original DaVinci and > > DA8xx devices. > > I looked at DM6467 and it's the same as OMAPL13x, except at a different > address. Rather than a callback, it could be just an address in the > platform data. Sounds okay as long as _all_ the DaVinci devices have the same bit to be set. Plus, I hope there are no other users of the register so that there is no race with other platform code using the same register. Thanks, Sekhar