From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bajor.fuzziesquirrel.com (mail.fuzziesquirrel.com [173.167.31.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BA41A077B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:42:48 +1000 (AEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fuzziesquirrel.com Sender: bradleyb@bajor.fuzziesquirrel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: BSP layers From: Brad Bishop In-Reply-To: <20150929144451.GF14293@asimov.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:42:42 -0400 Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <722865DA-D254-4972-9020-E6D01F95EC60@bwbmail.net> <20150929144451.GF14293@asimov.ibm.com> To: Patrick Williams X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:42:49 -0000 Patrick Automatic versioning seems fine for now. I will update that. For the openbmc hierarchy how about: meta-openbmc-bsp/meta-aspeed -> meta-aspeed meta-openbmc-machines/meta-openpower -> meta-openpower thx - Brad > On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Patrick Williams = wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:47:59PM -0400, Brad Bishop wrote: >> I have a couple new layer repositories: >>=20 >> https://github.com/bradbishop/meta-aspeed = >> https://github.com/bradbishop/meta-openpower = >>=20 >> Appreciate any feedback. >>=20 >> Thx! - brad >>=20 >=20 > Brad, >=20 > I noticed in the layer.conf files we are manually assigning priority. > Do we want to allow the automatic assignment or is there some = guidelines > on what the priority should be? >=20 > Seems that you have: > * BMC Hardware Layer - 7 > * Host Machine Class - 8 > * Host Machine Specific - 9 > * OEM Machine Enhancment - 10 (not there, but imagined by me). >=20 > Based on the conference call we had last week, I think we should go > ahead and make github.com/openbmc repositories for these two you have. > I can create that if you want. >=20 > What is your proposal for where these repositories live in > openbmc/openbmc? meta-openbmc-bsp for meta-aspeed? I'm unsure if > meta-openpower belongs under a meta-openbmc-machines or > meta-phosphor/meta-machines? >=20 > --=20 > Patrick Williams