From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luck, Tony" Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:47:34 +0000 Subject: RE: git pull on ia64 linux tree Message-Id: List-Id: References: <200504222203.j3MM3fV17003@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200504222203.j3MM3fV17003@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:54:26AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote: >> Bjorn Helgaas: >> [IA64] don't report !sn2 or !summit hardware as an error >> [IA64] SGI SN drivers: don't report !sn2 hardware as an error > >I thought hch solved this by fixing the initcall code to not >treat -ENODEV as an error worthy of reporting? That's what happens when I get far, far behind on LKML. I've found traces of the threads ... though none by hch, and no clear agreement about whether 0 or -ENODEV is right. Some of this code is linked into the ia64 generic kernel by default, so I'm leaning a little towards Bjorn's position that we shouldn't be returning an error. -Tony