Re: [tsvwg] WGLC comments request for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-04.txt

* Re: [tsvwg] WGLC comments request for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-04.txt - to end Fri 8th Dec 20
@ 2017-11-21 21:53 Michael Tuexen
  2017-11-21 22:13 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
  2017-11-22 13:02 ` Michael Tuexen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tuexen @ 2017-11-21 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

> On 21. Nov 2017, at 21:52, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
> 
> I have no comments on it myself. Have used this Errata some time ago
> (we had rwnd/cwnd handling fixes because of the errata), went over it
> again now, LGTM and I don't think we have (major) discrepancies due to
> it.
Hi Marcelo,

can you make this statement on tsvwg@ietf.org?

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcelo
> 
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:00:00PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I'm working on an internet draft dealing with errata in RFC 4960. This document is now
>> in working group last call and can be accessed via
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-04
>> 
>> It would be really great if someone with insights in the Linux SCTP stack could review it
>> and provide comments on the IETF mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org.
>> 
>> That plan is to get an Informational RFC which describes the required changes to RFC 4960
>> and then base an upcoming RFC4960bis document on this Informational RFC. This is basically
>> the same approach as we took when moving from RFC 2960 to RFC 4960. The errata where
>> documented in RFC 4460.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> 
>> Thank you very much for your help in advance.
>> 
>> Michael TÃ¼xen
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
>>> Subject: [tsvwg] WGLC comments request for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-04.txt - to end Fri 8th Dec 2017
>>> Date: 17. November 2017 at 07:18:35 CET
>>> To: tsvwg@ietf.org
>>> Cc: tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org
>>> Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dear TSVWG WG,
>>> 
>>> As we discussed during the TSVWG session today, the draft "RFC 4960 Errata and Issues", is thought ready for publication and now ready for feedback. The latest version of the draft is available here:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-04
>>> 
>>> This email starts a 3 week WGLC to allow time for folks to provide feedback, to conclude on Fri 8th Dec 2017. Please send comments indicating the usefulness of the draft, noting issues, or simply asking for clariification to this list (or to the WG Dhairs).
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> Gorry, David and Wes
>>> (TSVWG co-Chairs)
>>> 
>>> The following people have agreed to also submit a review during the WGLC period:
>>> Kacheong
>>> Peter Lei
>>> Irene Rungeler
>>> Qiaobing Xie
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread