From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [81.169.183.159] (helo=coruscant.onosendai.de)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <zecke@selfish.org>) id 1IdQ5o-000869-5i
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:46:16 +0200
Received: from dsl-62-220-14-162.berlikomm.net ([62.220.14.162]
	helo=[192.168.1.23]) by coruscant.onosendai.de with esmtpsa
	(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <zecke@selfish.org>) id 1IdQ0g-0007MH-EL
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:40:58 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <4704CC05.40206@klever.net>
References: <1191494488.2516.34.camel@toontown> <4704CC05.40206@klever.net>
Message-Id: <B9AD73C2-790F-43EE-9FC4-96F1B1FA9415@selfish.org>
From: Holger Freyther <zecke@selfish.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:40:24 +0200
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Subject: Re: hello...
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:46:16 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Am 04.10.2007 um 13:18 schrieb Michael Krelin:

>> The next point will perhaps not make me many friends on this list,  
>> but
>> I am not exactly too fond of monotone. I for one would prefer if
>> openembedded used git. Mostly because it is *so* much faster. My  
>> machine
>> is fairly decent I would say and still the usage experience isn't  
>> that
>> great. (`mtn status` = zZzz :)
>
> So would I (and not only for performance reasons), but I doubt it's
> going to happen anytime soon ;-)

Hi,

If someone can host my mtn2git script and a git tree we can have a  
git mirror almost immediately. But yes I think there are some good  
reasons to stay with monotone as primary system.


z.