From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932814Ab1EFVYl (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 17:24:41 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:33988 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932663Ab1EFVYj (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 17:24:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1304716255.25414.2540.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <4DC45537.6070609@linux.intel.com> <1304713252.25414.2532.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1304716255.25414.2540.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:24:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fix powerTOP regression with 2.6.39-rc5 From: Linus Torvalds To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/6/11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Steven Rostedt > > Um, this is an internal tracepoint. Does this mean that all internal > data inside the kernel that is exported with trace events are locked > down? it's clearly NOT an internal tracepoint. By definition. It's being used by powertop. What part of "reality" vs "your wishes" didn't you understand? Linus > >> >> I