From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935319Ab1ETFYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 01:24:37 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.67]:6389 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751287Ab1ETFYg (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 01:24:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=CvUJmrWb9YtFm9s7P+B/IWMYpa8YpcqePo5qGXDmi5qveAJ1vUl9ff5UbyfNJaoL7K mRGIc1LvWB1rhrzjjykw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110426014741.GB28721@quad.lixom.net> References: <1302822031-6752-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <4DA7A914.5020804@codeaurora.org> <143ea9b1bb96e613d534caa7cb3a1e2d.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> <20110426014741.GB28721@quad.lixom.net> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:24:31 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cUXVtQY9FqMtLxfSJmqRlC00umw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler From: Simon Glass To: Olof Johansson Cc: Stephen Boyd , anish singh , lak , Russell King , Tony Lindgren , Nicolas Pitre , Catalin Marinas , Joe Perches , Laurent Pinchart , Alexander Shishkin , Phil Carmody , Rabin Vincent , lk , Omar Ramirez Luna , Dave Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:01:59AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> It's here: >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6885/1 >> >> I imagine it will be added when/if Russell picks it up. Sadly it >> increases the LOC in ARM so Simon might need to really >> sell it to get it merged. > > It's core code though, and the concern today is not with ARM core code > as much as with the various platforms that are growing seemingly without > upper bounds. Hi, Can anyone advise please what happens next with this patch? So far I have posted it to the list, it has been reviewed on the list and I have put it into the patch system. What is the next step please to get this into the kernel? Regards, Simon > > > -Olof > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sjg@chromium.org (Simon Glass) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:24:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler In-Reply-To: <20110426014741.GB28721@quad.lixom.net> References: <1302822031-6752-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <4DA7A914.5020804@codeaurora.org> <143ea9b1bb96e613d534caa7cb3a1e2d.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> <20110426014741.GB28721@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:01:59AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> It's here: >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6885/1 >> >> I imagine it will be added when/if Russell picks it up. Sadly it >> increases the LOC in ARM so Simon might need to really >> sell it to get it merged. > > It's core code though, and the concern today is not with ARM core code > as much as with the various platforms that are growing seemingly without > upper bounds. Hi, Can anyone advise please what happens next with this patch? So far I have posted it to the list, it has been reviewed on the list and I have put it into the patch system. What is the next step please to get this into the kernel? Regards, Simon > > > -Olof >