From: anupam.kapoor@gmail.com (Anupam Kapoor)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Disabling nagle algorithm
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:01:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin7HRAuiHUnsQuxrf3iKZrJx04ZcA@mail.gmail.com>
yet another option would be to setup point-to-point ethernet device
(^^) via tun/tap drivers. you can have a userland program receiving
data from the said device, and then use whatever options you want
there.
anupam
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Anupam Kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com> wrote:
> yup, that's what i also think. is it possible that nagle+delayed-ack
> is causing the perceived slow-down ?
>
> anupam
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> frankly it is not wise to disable nagle, and the solution i proposed
>> (using netfilter extension) is really too tedious - the added overhead
>> may slow down the processing, even though disabling nagle aims to
>> improve latencies. ? but modern network card is so fast, that the
>> bottleneck is not at the network card side, but more likely in the
>> network gateway, or router side - so u are definitely not going to see
>> improvement in spite of all the troubles.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Peter Teoh
>>
>
>
>
> --
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
>
--
In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
Emacs was the lambda.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-29 17:34 Disabling nagle algorithm C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 3:48 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30 3:51 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 4:23 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-30 4:47 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 7:39 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30 8:07 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-30 8:34 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-30 13:48 ` C K Kashyap
2011-05-31 0:33 ` Peter Teoh
2011-05-31 2:41 ` Anupam Kapoor
2011-05-31 2:54 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-06-01 5:31 ` Anupam Kapoor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikm8Dv7h9oyfKN71ym6OpBZNQxCLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=anupam.kapoor@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.