From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:10:16 +1000
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Accurate boot time measurement
In-Reply-To: <20110516055644.670C21491B07@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1305319923-9477-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
	<201105140734.13610.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<BANLkTikbUdVza1iLe_Vdj4RsJUwRtO4kQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DCFA503.2070805@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=i1vmrSBh4KZh8BLFoUzEQr1i4Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinsYPvnPg06uoLZE65t-FCqdN_-tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110516055644.670C21491B07@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <BANLkTiknEU4ka7mxvMCEY1EP9Ve5MdSwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message <BANLkTinsYPvnPg06uoLZE65t-FCqdN_-tg@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> I've thought of a 'better' approach:
>> ? - Do no modify the parameters of show_boot_progress()
>> ? - Create a new struct:
>> ? ? struct boot_progress_msg {
>> ? ? ? int boot_progress_id;
>> ? ? ? const char *message;
>> ? ? {
>
> Where do you store this data _before_ relocation, when we have no
> access to RAM yet?

This data is Read-Only so pre/post relocation is not an issue. The boot
stage records however are a problem

Regards,

Graeme