From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:57847 "EHLO
	mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753416Ab1EWVq5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 May 2011 17:46:57 -0400
Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so5181683iwn.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinrM1oBfKUoCzs9_DOw+EmpW=ikig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DD6E9B5.3020905@candelatech.com> <BANLkTindTMFNNpyNpNndhhGv7qWB5_haGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DDA913B.1060002@candelatech.com> <4DDAA9ED.1050606@candelatech.com>
 <4DDAACF3.3050705@candelatech.com> <BANLkTimizNePq-GFsOYxNtfDNLc8kqjJFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DDABEE9.9090608@candelatech.com> <BANLkTineDDcWvmr8M5hp-=b0LDRamZyovQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DDAC8DC.5060803@candelatech.com> <BANLkTimSUvfSzAHXQJppZ=7T2TKMuP37fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DDACF56.9070403@candelatech.com> <BANLkTikSb-6Uh5jnEUD4wrGCKUNmrF3Zow@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DDAD3D5.1070001@candelatech.com> <BANLkTinrM1oBfKUoCzs9_DOw+EmpW=ikig@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:46:37 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTimDXqa+67=UFY4KS5zwOBrinH_k8g@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110523_234700_850293_16779872)
Subject: Re: ath9k 9380: All 5Ghz channels flagged as passive-scanning
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:

> No. You can only do this by trying to take the card out of compliance
> purposely or unknowingly in software.

Oh and my point was that "regulatory hacks" fit this description.

  Luis