From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Teck Choon Giam Subject: Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1872 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:16:53 +0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: MaoXiaoyun Cc: jeremy@goop.org, xen devel , keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dave@ivt.com.au List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > Hi, > > Sorry, since this mmu related BUG has been troubled me for very > long... I really want to "kill" this BUG but my knowledge in kernel > hacking and/or xen is very limited. > > While waiting for Jeremy or Konrad or others ... > > Many thanks for spending time to track down this mmu related BUG. =A0I > have backported the commit from > http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=3Dcommit;h= =3D64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec > to 2.6.32.36 PVOPS kernel and patch attached. =A0I won't know whether > did I backport it correctly nor does it affects anything. =A0I am > currently testing the 2.6.32.36 PVOPS kernel with this patch applied > and also unset CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. =A0Currently running testcrash.sh > loop 1000 as I am unable to reproduce this mmu BUG 1872 in > testcrash.sh loop 100. =A0Please note that when CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > is unset, I can reproduce this mmu BUG 1872 easily within <50 > testcrash.sh loop cycle with PVOPS version 2.6.32.24 to 2.6.32.36 > kernel. =A0Now test with this backport patch to see whether I can > reproduce this mmu BUG... ... > > Kindest regards, > Giam Teck Choon > I have tested with my backport patch and it is working fine as I am unable to reproduce the mmu.c 1872 or 1860 bug with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC not set. I tested with testcrash.sh loop 100 and 1000. Now doing testcrash.sh loop 10000. Xiaoyun, is it possible for you to test my patch and see whether can you reproduce the mmu.c 1872/1860 bug? Can anyone of you review my patch? I will post a format patch according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches in my next reply and hopefully can be reviewed. Thanks. Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon