All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: miloody@gmail.com (loody)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: about 64-bits division in kernel
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:51:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimkyaqLJZ1C9_gtjsVcctUhhA+RrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinjDOR57PydHKxpHbcG6umgjJEifQ@mail.gmail.com>

hi Dave:
Thanks for your kind reply.
2011/5/20 Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail.com>:
> Hi lody,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM, loody <miloody@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi all:
>> My platform is 32-bits cpu and I need following calculation in my driver.
>> #define longdiv(sr1, sr2, div) ? ? ?(unsigned long )((((unsigned long
>> long)(sr1) << 32) ^ (sr2)) / (div))
>>
>> my question are:
>> 1. why "__udivdi3" has any relationship with above calculation?
>
> Because you're doing 64 bit arithmetic (unsigned long long) and 64 bit
> division is not supported in all kernels.

why the name "__udivdi3" has relation to 64-bits arighmetic?
Why linker ask for "__udivdi3", it seems there is a common sense for
linker that when doing 64-bits calculation it will try to find
"__udivdi3", am i right?

>
>> 2. I know the above calculation is implemented in clibc, but why
>> kernel still implement itself?
>> ? ? why kernel try to make another wheel instead of including what
>> clib provided ?
>
> The kernel doesn't use anything from the C runtime ?library at all.
>
> 64-bit division and floating point are 2 things not supported in the
> kernel, although they do happen to word on some platforms, they aren't
> portable operations.
>
the 64-bit division seem supported in gcc toolchain, and gcc will take
care the platform issue when we cross-compile the gcc, right?
It should be safe to static link the 64bits division in gcc.

-- 
Regards,

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  3:34 about 64-bits division in kernel loody
2011-05-20  4:15 ` Dave Hylands
2011-05-20  5:51   ` loody [this message]
2011-05-20  6:47     ` Dave Hylands
2011-05-21  6:57       ` loody
2011-05-21  7:22         ` Dave Hylands

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimkyaqLJZ1C9_gtjsVcctUhhA+RrA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miloody@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.