From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henry Chang Subject: Re: The cache problem of re-export NFS test Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:19:58 +0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:54724 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151Ab1DNPT7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:19:59 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1246635fxm.19 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:19:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sylar Shen Cc: Brian Chrisman , Sage Weil , ceph-devel Have you tried the option no_wdelay with sync? Perhaps that's what you want since it minimizes the cache effect. 2011/4/14 Sylar Shen : > Yes, after testing I found that "sync" will still do the cache in mem= ory. > But what I want to know =C2=A0is the real speed to write data into th= e disks. > I know it may not be safe without using memory and the speed may go v= ery slow. > However, that's what I am trying to find out. > Thanks~~^^ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html