From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: Why QCOW1? (was: [PATCH v2] kvm tool: add QCOW verions 1 read/write support) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:10:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1302722762-30517-1-git-send-email-prasadjoshi124@gmail.com> <4DA6AA2F.2020306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Markus Armbruster , Kevin Wolf , Prasad Joshi , mingo@elte.hu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Stefan Hajnoczi Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:52819 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877Ab1DOMKr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:10:47 -0400 Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so2009559vxi.19 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:10:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi w= rote: > People don't have existing QCOW1 images they want to boot from :). > > They have vmdk, vhd, vdi, or qcow2. =A0You can use qemu-img to conver= t > them to raw. =A0You can use qemu-nbd if you are desperate to boot fro= m > or inspect them in-place. > > But I think the natural path for a native Linux KVM tool is to fully > exploit file systems and block layer features in Linux instead of > implementing a userspace block layer. =46or optimum performance, sure, but we want to support non-native images for usability reasons.