From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755477Ab1EWPYm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 11:24:42 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43606 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755364Ab1EWPYl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 11:24:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:23:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] vDSO time changes for 2.6.40 To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > [Patch 8/8 is brand-new and optional.  If anyone objects to it, >  please just drop it for 2.6.40 and I'll fix it for 2.6.41.] Hmm. I would just put it into 7/8 immediately, and never have the stupid read-lock loop in the first place. Or I would just say "the time() system call just isn't that critical, let's not even bother". But I'll bow to the x86 people on this. I think the series is ok, Linus