From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s36.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s36.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.108]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EABDDE2B for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 03:25:58 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: "Ming Liu" To: jrocnuck@hotmail.com Subject: RE: What is the difference between Montavista Kernel SourceandKernel.Org Source Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:25:55 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Eric, Thanks for your reply first. >>Another question. Because Montavista kernel is also based on the >>open >>source linux kernel from the general tree, does this mean that the >>Montavista one is also open source and could be free to be >>distributed >>according to GPL. However as far as I know, that's not true. :) Because you have worked for Montavista Linux, so could you please answer me this question? I know that anyone can distribute and modify GPL source code and then the modified code also obey GPL. So how about Montavista Linux? :) I am just a little confused with this rule. BR Ming _________________________________________________________________ Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/