All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org"
	<stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org>,
	"rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org" <rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org>
Cc: "Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Jie Deng" <jie.deng@intel.com>,
	"Bill Mills" <bill.mills@linaro.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd.bergmann@linaro.com>,
	"Mike Holmes" <mike.holmes@linaro.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:15:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR02MB67723D1A938BF34B1C5B363EB0409@BY5PR02MB6772.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR02MB6772BFF2315EEF33E187D468B0409@BY5PR02MB6772.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

Hi, I didn't realize that you had already CCed the rust-vmm mailing list, so anyways it is a good start. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Trilok Soni 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 10:14 AM
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>; stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org; rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>; Mike Holmes <mike.holmes@linaro.org>; Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.com>; Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon

Viresh,

For rust-vmm, you need to create the new issue in the right project. You can probably pick up vmm-reference project at rust-vmm and ask for the new crate. You can also send email to rust-vmm mailing list but github "issues" feature is used heavily in the rust-vmm project. There is also bi-weekly meetings which is attended by me, Vatsa and rust-vmm developers where it can be put up as agenda. 

The minimal requirement for the new crate is to have less (or almost none) dependencies on other crates so that they can be independently tested in the rust-vmm CI. Anyways, please file a new issue and I will ask Vatsa and others to comment there. 

https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-user-backend
http://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/rust-vmm/2021-March/000406.html

---Trilok Soni

-----Original Message-----
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 5:23 AM
To: stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org; rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>; Mike Holmes <mike.holmes@linaro.org>; Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.com>; Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>
Subject: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

In my earlier attempt [1], I implemented the vhost-user-i2c backend deamon for QEMU (though the code was generic enough to be used with any hypervisor).

And here is a Rust implementation of the vhost-user-i2c backend daemon. Again this is generic enough to be used with any hypervisor and can live in its own repository now:

  https://github.com/vireshk/vhost-user-i2c

I am not sure what's the process to get this merged to Rust-vmm.
Can someone help ? Is that the right thing to do ?

-------------------------8<-------------------------

Here are other details (which are same since the earlier Qemu
attempt):

This is an initial implementation of a generic vhost-user backend for the I2C bus. This is based of the virtio specifications (already merged) for the I2C bus.

The kernel virtio I2C driver is still under review, here [2] is the latest version (v10):

The backend is implemented as a vhost-user device because we want to experiment in making portable backends that can be used with multiple hypervisors.  We also want to support backends isolated in their own separate service VMs with limited memory cross-sections with the principle guest. This is part of a wider initiative by Linaro called "project Stratos" for which you can find information here:

  https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/STR/Stratos+Home

I2C Testing:
------------

I didn't have access to a real hardware where I can play with a I2C client device (like RTC, eeprom, etc) to verify the working of the backend daemon, so I decided to test it on my x86 box itself with hierarchy of two ARM64 guests.

The first ARM64 guest was passed "-device ds1338,address=0x20" option, so it could emulate a ds1338 RTC device, which connects to an I2C bus.
Once the guest came up, ds1338 device instance was created within the guest kernel by doing:

  echo ds1338 0x20 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device

[
  Note that this may end up binding the ds1338 device to its driver,
  which won't let our i2c daemon talk to the device. For that we need to
  manually unbind the device from the driver:

  echo 0-0020 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0020/driver/unbind
]

After this is done, you will get /dev/rtc1. This is the device we wanted to emulate, which will be accessed by the vhost-user-i2c backend daemon via the /dev/i2c-0 file present in the guest VM.

At this point we need to start the backend daemon and give it a socket-path to talk to from qemu (you can pass -v to it to get more detailed messages):

  target/debug/vhost-user-i2c --socket-path=vi2c.sock -l 0:32

[ Here, 0:32 is the bus/device mapping, 0 for /dev/i2c-0 and 32 (i.e.
0x20) is client address of ds1338 that we used while creating the device. ]

Now we need to start the second level ARM64 guest (from within the first
guest) to get the i2c-virtio.c Linux driver up. The second level guest is passed the following options to connect to the same socket:

  -chardev socket,path=vi2c.sock,id=vi2c \
  -device vhost-user-i2c-pci,chardev=vi2c,id=i2c

Once the second level guest boots up, we will see the i2c-virtio bus at /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-X/. From there we can now make it emulate the
ds1338 device again by doing:

  echo ds1338 0x20 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device

[ This time we want ds1338's driver to be bound to the device, so it should be enabled in the kernel as well. ]

And we will get /dev/rtc1 device again here in the second level guest.
Now we can play with the rtc device with help of hwclock utility and we can see the following sequence of transfers happening if we try to update rtc's time from system time.

hwclock -w -f /dev/rtc1 (in guest2) ->
  Reaches i2c-virtio.c (Linux bus driver in guest2) ->
    transfer over virtio ->
      Reaches the qemu's vhost-i2c device emulation (running over guest1) ->
        Reaches the backend daemon vhost-user-i2c started earlier (in guest1) ->
          ioctl(/dev/i2c-0, I2C_RDWR, ..); (in guest1) ->
            reaches qemu's hw/rtc/ds1338.c (running over host)



SMBUS Testing:
--------------

I wasn't required to have such a tedious setup for testing out with SMBUS devices. I was able to emulate a SMBUS device on my x86 machine using i2c-stub driver.

$ modprobe i2c-stub chip_addr=0x20
//Boot the arm64 guest now with i2c-virtio driver and then do:
$ echo al3320a 0x20 > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0/new_device
$ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device0/in_illuminance_raw

That's it.

I hope I was able to give a clear picture of my test setup here :)

--
viresh

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/cover.1617278395.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/226a8d5663b7bb6f5d06ede7701eedb18d1bafa1.1616493817.git.jie.deng@intel.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28 12:22 [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon Viresh Kumar
2021-04-28 17:13 ` Trilok Soni
2021-04-28 17:15   ` Trilok Soni [this message]
2021-04-29  7:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-20  4:00     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-20  5:03       ` Trilok Soni
2021-05-20  5:06         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-21 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-28  5:17 ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR02MB67723D1A938BF34B1C5B363EB0409@BY5PR02MB6772.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.com \
    --cc=bill.mills@linaro.org \
    --cc=jie.deng@intel.com \
    --cc=mike.holmes@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org \
    --cc=stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.