All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 18:01:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44514BFA9D7B8CCA668CBE5BF8F59@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003bf3bd-bd2b-b365-5f00-7455369b7295@redhat.com>

Hi Maxime, 

I don’t see them on the baseband tree  dpdk-next-baseband

I did a clean clone, these are the last 3 commits
  dc0a5a0d2a (HEAD -> for-main, origin/for-main) test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure
  0e927787a3 test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag
  51d49ccd23 test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag

I don’t see the last 3 commits from patchwork (ie. the serie from that email)
  [v1,3/3] app/bbdev-test: remove offload cost optional build flag	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	3--	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
  [v1,2/3] drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	1--	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
  [v1,1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure	bbdev: remove offload cost	- - -	11-	2022-12-14	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,3/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	10--	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,2/3] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	1--	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream
[v3,1/3] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag	test/bbdev: fix build issues with optional build flag	- 1 -	11-	2022-12-13	Chautru, Nicolas	mcoquelin	Awaiting Upstream

Do I miss something? This last serie doesn’t look applied on the remote repo. Could you double check?
Thanks
Nic


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 4:43 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 1/3/23 23:07, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > Happy new year.
> 
> Happy new year.
> 
> > What does the state " Awaiting Upstream" mean in patchwork for that
> serie? Can this be applied?
> 
> It means it is the the bbdev tree, and is awaiting being pulled into the main
> tree.
> 
> So it is applied, but only in the bbdev tree for now.
> This should not be an issue since you shold base your work on top of the
> bbdev tree.
> 
> Regards,
> Maxime
> 
> > Thanks
> > Nic
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 3:34 PM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
> >> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; Chautru, Nicolas
> >> <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost
> >>
> >> Removing the optional build flag RTE_BBDEV_OFFLOAD_COST from Intel
> >> baseband PMDs and bbdev-test application.
> >> This helps to simplify build variants complexity causing compilation
> >> issues to be missed.
> >>
> >> Maxime, the first commit is actually a miss related to last commit on
> >> top of tree, you may want to merge these two commits together in the
> history.
> >> Sorry for missing it earlier.
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicolas Chautru (3):
> >>    test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure
> >>    drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag
> >>    app/bbdev-test: remove offload cost optional build flag
> >>
> >>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c              | 29 +-------
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h             | 12 +---
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c         |  2 -
> >>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc200_pmd.c         |  2 -
> >>   .../fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c         | 10 ---
> >>   drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c  | 10 ---
> >>   .../baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c  | 70 ++++---------------
> >>   7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 23:33 [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost Nicolas Chautru
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:51   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-06 15:37     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-01-10  8:32   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:54   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-12-14 23:33 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] app/bbdev-test: " Nicolas Chautru
2023-01-06 14:55   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-03 22:07 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost Chautru, Nicolas
2023-01-04 12:42   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-04 18:01     ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2023-01-05  9:53       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-10  8:43 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44514BFA9D7B8CCA668CBE5BF8F59@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.