From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A8FC433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9986D20848 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="To3wAtuw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727000AbgH0UPG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:15:06 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:7020 "EHLO hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726120AbgH0UPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:15:05 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:14:20 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:15:03 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:15:03 -0700 Received: from HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) by HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:02 +0000 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.172) by HQMAIL109.nvidia.com (172.20.187.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:02 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VZAI4UxET2hofqll3x+3FKLGxCMMQHlYWbkNMj6iUOUZcjUdCGFnDSAi9ly24yPDlsXsxGv9nw/HSs6ipi2xyv+Bw13z3jwa7/uRF59syFw0Hl7XTz51/4Anuux5DKb+ihNrn/i8SFAsZDHCebm5mwwMZcYoVZiah9wD/034KehD1sRxvYqJ4I0varZ7Id9r6VkJ4HAMKhsQUaFeHNq7FWyFYMrQix96EnQFlHvpaI/+nGLHc8q4KbIbOCwGuCWLlh8PJEmGtLQ+Gkb6YumAP/eNlSmUZ+072Tx7qS5cKVWAaSLhvf4ZdU6uJYzZ5FR1IhH8dfPOsSe3QNS2tKjGsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MqozqGbdL4DmDxC1HnNXphlhNWh7o39PXOemrfnPZeE=; b=MkSK+f9AzMeVKGmoXCg8Tc5YCiVFzbW9DjgnKUfQrVtKIh3IZHb6W1w9E89CQ0YmMfyFqhmBayP+xmaylF6pRA8C1AWb07PEikNMv68ibYZzSWeL4cNxJqRBFjaVW714hFhIdlhcp6DRDxPO+g2w2ZBMecKZRWOLVqj7zLp9k/l4pw1Egx1kFzrfnRKX0gC9UmDws4XIHmalE3tCNLSgJsa4UlEf/tu3A1puu/5ymNTipgELOkAKkxp2+3F+ZRvRbthmroHlDnxJFuk/fgFmz1bJ4pAxn6hdukuR/N/zR8jeGAPvS25YqpkivC0YoVcmd5wBfy0U52Y+gIjIcQWCCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none Received: from BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:20a::20) by BY5PR12MB3841.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:194::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:01 +0000 Received: from BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b5f0:8a21:df98:7707]) by BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b5f0:8a21:df98:7707%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.032; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:01 +0000 From: Parav Pandit To: Jakub Kicinski CC: Parav Pandit , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "roid@mellanox.com" , "saeedm@mellanox.com" , Jiri Pirko Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Consider other controller while building phys_port_name Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Consider other controller while building phys_port_name Thread-Index: AQHWeugVEZjy8+Bcu0qKDL1vbGgf/KlJitKAgABAGdCAAQhmgIAAinbQgADtLwCAABeykA== Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:15:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200825135839.106796-1-parav@mellanox.com> <20200825135839.106796-3-parav@mellanox.com> <20200825173203.2c80ed48@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN> <20200826130747.4d886a09@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN> <20200827113216.7b9a3a25@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20200827113216.7b9a3a25@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kernel.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nvidia.com; x-originating-ip: [49.207.209.10] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ec0d8008-9913-4932-c52b-08d84ac5e113 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR12MB3841: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: e5geeLzPPUig0BFkyS8iIGmTIKk+dC3l3NWEMQLN26Cc5mWwFHaSJRhPYorfQPiFd/zoRvQ+jMhMn9UhY7qtn4KQAJA5VANNIFi2aMN/gyZMp2oEc8XgeuGuiSGT49JU9Lm/p8Fw8J6lRX+tEpDc2YDOR46sRc75IXdtIXSD4Mj7Ywy7C8hHat8WoULHurkqC6NhXvY4y1R2tGMLK0D0f04WHHCO+eMwwhV/okyTJ1FGN8OhmwJItfGlM7OfB+b2q2/f5zsWg/oFuq5hjpz7nJytVq/g4G20ywMLHVKw0JBGT6EzslkqwXbLXOuFqYaJWMOYi/vMw9JaJfVDs6naow== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(136003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(66946007)(86362001)(66476007)(6506007)(8676002)(64756008)(66556008)(76116006)(55236004)(4326008)(83380400001)(7696005)(2906002)(9686003)(26005)(186003)(55016002)(8936002)(52536014)(6916009)(107886003)(71200400001)(316002)(66446008)(5660300002)(478600001)(54906003)(33656002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ec0d8008-9913-4932-c52b-08d84ac5e113 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Aug 2020 20:15:01.6275 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: J75HJLofjVbAdgJKdejc+3FCHJpT5/XtF7AqhbII0ZI29cJ5kgV7OAG3APm3javAJlK209ceQFCB6TrqZJnSZg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR12MB3841 X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1598559260; bh=MqozqGbdL4DmDxC1HnNXphlhNWh7o39PXOemrfnPZeE=; h=X-PGP-Universal:ARC-Seal:ARC-Message-Signature: ARC-Authentication-Results:From:To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:authentication-results:x-originating-ip: x-ms-publictraffictype:x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: x-ms-traffictypediagnostic:x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs:x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck:x-microsoft-antispam: x-microsoft-antispam-message-info:x-forefront-antispam-report: x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id:X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped:X-OriginatorOrg; b=To3wAtuw2LqMixp+wyxtaaD10v9qgADxOjcCSGt3N1eJQluq2OmxKGcQpFxXpSSPL 3grAV+wcz8m9ZUEAEgBQauTkMXZQqiJw2PmHO3ar15DafDtIZcyqIaTMMpj12zbvtq GtbbbOe9/SJWLN0gaPu/LEOgCjRZT/ouMXC5fHwf61dYlGr+MHQkD4vPcRO/EnzZte 50bYJsCiJ0r2H7iFvBXaU3GitQnpkg+rZrCoPCf0MbcJXU92k1xu9nCv8NFI1mWNbh HGbgDTcbZRdGt0iuFtTzgP5vxYNz+egS0C//JIUTq+xHaenxJ9soyd2edACXulRSyt yOo5R2QSYY/8g== Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > From: Jakub Kicinski > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 12:02 AM >=20 > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 04:31:43 +0000 Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > $ devlink port show looks like below without a controller annotatio= n. > > > > pci/0000:00:08.0/0: type eth netdev eth5 flavour physical > > > > pci/0000:00:08.0/1: type eth netdev eth6 flavour pcipf pfnum 0 > > > > pci/0000:00:08.0/2: type eth netdev eth7 flavour pcipf pfnum 0 > > > > > > How can you have two PF 0? Aaah - by controller you mean hardware > > > IP, not whoever is controlling the switching! So the chip has > > > multiple HW controllers, each of which can have multiple PFs? > > > > > Hardware IP is one. This IP is plugged into two PCI root complexes. > > One is eswitch PF, this PF has its own VFs/SFs. > > Other PF(s) plugged into an second PCI Root complex serving the server > system. > > So you are right there are multiple PFs. >=20 > I find it strange that you have pfnum 0 everywhere but then different > controllers. There are multiple PFs, connected to different PCI RC. So device has same p= fnum for both the PFs. > For MultiHost at Netronome we've used pfnum to distinguish > between the hosts. ASIC must have some unique identifiers for each PF. >=20 Yes. there is. It is identified by a unique controller number; internally i= t is called host_number. But internal host_number is misleading term as multiple cables of same phys= ical card can be plugged into single host. So identifying based on a unique (controller) number and matching that up o= n external cable is desired. > I'm not aware of any practical reason for creating PFs on one RC without > reinitializing all the others. I may be misunderstanding, but how is initialization is related multiple PF= s? >=20 > I can see how having multiple controllers may make things clearer, but ad= ding > another layer of IDs while the one under it is unused (pfnum=3D0) feels v= ery > unnecessary. pfnum=3D0 is used today. not sure I understand your comment about being unu= sed. Can you please explain? Hierarchical naming kind of make sense, but if you have other ideas to anno= tate the controller, without changing the hardware pfnum, lets discuss. >=20 > > Both the PFs have same PCI BDF. >=20 > BDFs are irrelevant.