All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajay Gupta <ajayg@nvidia.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "wsa@the-dreams.de" <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	"peda@axentia.se" <peda@axentia.se>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [v13,2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 21:55:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2727B1FAF918B77A4B88C3DFDCF70@BYAPR12MB2727.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

Hi Heikki and Andy
[...]
> > > Shouldn't you return -ETIMEDOUT if count == 0?
> > Yes. Good catch. Does the below fix looks ok?
> >
> >         do {
> >                 status = ccg_write(uc, CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG, &data, sizeof(data));
> >                 if (status < 0)
> >                         return status;
> >
> >                 usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> >
> >                 status = ccg_read(uc, CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG, &data, sizeof(data));
> >                 if (status < 0)
> >                         return status;
> >
> >                 if (!data)
> >                         return 0;
> >         } while (data && count--);
> 
> Doesn't that condition break out of the loop immediately?
How? I didn't get your point? We want to break out when data is
zero (interrupt status cleared).

> > Ah, I see, but why you not reorganize it to put this into do-while loop?
We actually need to check data after reading it so will reorganize accordingly.
do {
	read
	check for data and break out if (!data)
	write
	sleep
} while (--count);

Thanks
Ajay
-nvpublic
> >         return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >
> > > Something like:
> > >
> > >         ...
> > >         while (count--)
> > > 		status = ccg_read(uc, CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG, &data,
> sizeof(data));
> > > 		if (status < 0)
> > > 			return status;
> > >                 if (!data)
> > >                         return 0;
> > > 	}
> > >
> > >         return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > >
> > > Or does the count of 10 have some specific meaning?
> > >
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_send_data(struct ucsi_ccg *uc) {
> > > > +	u8 *ppm = (u8 *)uc->ppm.data;
> > > > +	int status;
> > > > +	u16 rab;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rab = CCGX_RAB_UCSI_DATA_BLOCK(offsetof(struct ucsi_data,
> > > message_out));
> > > > +	status = ccg_write(uc, rab, ppm +
> > > > +			   offsetof(struct ucsi_data, message_out),
> > > > +			   sizeof(uc->ppm.data->message_out));
> > > > +	if (status < 0)
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rab = CCGX_RAB_UCSI_DATA_BLOCK(offsetof(struct ucsi_data, ctrl));
> > > > +	return ccg_write(uc, rab, ppm + offsetof(struct ucsi_data, ctrl),
> > > > +			 sizeof(uc->ppm.data->ctrl));
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_recv_data(struct ucsi_ccg *uc) {
> > > > +	u8 *ppm = (u8 *)uc->ppm.data;
> > > > +	int status;
> > > > +	u16 rab;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rab = CCGX_RAB_UCSI_DATA_BLOCK(offsetof(struct ucsi_data, cci));
> > > > +	status = ccg_read(uc, rab, ppm + offsetof(struct ucsi_data, cci),
> > > > +			  sizeof(uc->ppm.data->cci));
> > > > +	if (status < 0)
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rab = CCGX_RAB_UCSI_DATA_BLOCK(offsetof(struct ucsi_data,
> > > message_in));
> > > > +	return ccg_read(uc, rab, ppm + offsetof(struct ucsi_data, message_in),
> > > > +			sizeof(uc->ppm.data->message_in));
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_ack_interrupt(struct ucsi_ccg *uc) {
> > > > +	int status;
> > > > +	unsigned char data;
> > > > +
> > > > +	status = ccg_read(uc, CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG, &data, sizeof(data));
> > > > +	if (status < 0)
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return ccg_write(uc, CCGX_RAB_INTR_REG, &data, sizeof(data)); }
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_sync(struct ucsi_ppm *ppm) {
> > > > +	struct ucsi_ccg *uc = container_of(ppm, struct ucsi_ccg, ppm);
> > > > +	int status;
> > > > +
> > > > +	status = ucsi_ccg_recv_data(uc);
> > > > +	if (status < 0)
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* ack interrupt to allow next command to run */
> > > > +	return ucsi_ccg_ack_interrupt(uc); }
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_cmd(struct ucsi_ppm *ppm, struct ucsi_control
> > > > +*ctrl) {
> > > > +	struct ucsi_ccg *uc = container_of(ppm, struct ucsi_ccg, ppm);
> > > > +
> > > > +	ppm->data->ctrl.raw_cmd = ctrl->raw_cmd;
> > > > +	return ucsi_ccg_send_data(uc);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static irqreturn_t ccg_irq_handler(int irq, void *data) {
> > > > +	struct ucsi_ccg *uc = data;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ucsi_notify(uc->ucsi);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > > > +			  const struct i2c_device_id *id) {
> > > > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > > +	struct ucsi_ccg *uc;
> > > > +	int status;
> > > > +	u16 rab;
> > > > +
> > > > +	uc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*uc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!uc)
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > +	uc->ppm.data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct ucsi_data),
> > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!uc->ppm.data)
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > +	uc->ppm.cmd = ucsi_ccg_cmd;
> > > > +	uc->ppm.sync = ucsi_ccg_sync;
> > > > +	uc->dev = dev;
> > > > +	uc->client = client;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* reset ccg device and initialize ucsi */
> > > > +	status = ucsi_ccg_init(uc);
> > > > +	if (status < 0) {
> > > > +		dev_err(uc->dev, "ucsi_ccg_init failed - %d\n", status);
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	uc->irq = client->irq;
> > > > +
> > > > +	status = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, uc->irq, NULL,
> > > ccg_irq_handler,
> > > > +					   IRQF_ONESHOT |
> > > IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > > > +					   dev_name(dev), uc);
> > > > +	if (status < 0) {
> > > > +		dev_err(uc->dev, "request_threaded_irq failed - %d\n",
> > > status);
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	uc->ucsi = ucsi_register_ppm(dev, &uc->ppm);
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(uc->ucsi)) {
> > > > +		dev_err(uc->dev, "ucsi_register_ppm failed\n");
> > > > +		return PTR_ERR(uc->ucsi);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	rab = CCGX_RAB_UCSI_DATA_BLOCK(offsetof(struct ucsi_data,
> > > version));
> > > > +	status = ccg_read(uc, rab, (u8 *)(uc->ppm.data) +
> > > > +			  offsetof(struct ucsi_data, version),
> > > > +			  sizeof(uc->ppm.data->version));
> > > > +	if (status < 0) {
> > > > +		ucsi_unregister_ppm(uc->ucsi);
> > > > +		return status;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, uc);
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ucsi_ccg_remove(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > > +	struct ucsi_ccg *uc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > > > +
> > > > +	ucsi_unregister_ppm(uc->ucsi);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct i2c_device_id ucsi_ccg_device_id[] = {
> > > > +	{"ccgx-ucsi", 0},
> > > > +	{}
> > > > +};
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ucsi_ccg_device_id);
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct i2c_driver ucsi_ccg_driver = {
> > > > +	.driver = {
> > > > +		.name = "ucsi_ccg",
> > > > +	},
> > > > +	.probe = ucsi_ccg_probe,
> > > > +	.remove = ucsi_ccg_remove,
> > > > +	.id_table = ucsi_ccg_device_id,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +module_i2c_driver(ucsi_ccg_driver);
> > > > +
> > > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ajay Gupta <ajayg@nvidia.com>");
> > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UCSI driver for Cypress CCGx Type-C
> > > > +controller"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > >
> > > I'm still worried about how this driver works on other platforms. It
> > > just looks like you have written ccg_read/write() functions for only your
> I2C host.
> > >
> > > I would feel much more comfortable with this if you for example used
> > > those
> > > i2c_smbus_read/write*() helpers instead of raw i2c_transfer().
> > > I would expect them to force you to write your i2c host driver, as
> > > well as this driver, in a more generic fashion.
> >
> > I2c_smbus_read/write*() will not work with Cypress CCGx controller
> > since CCGx requires 2 byte of command for any read/write transaction.
> > I2c_smbus_read/write*() APIs support only 1 byte of command.
> 
> OK, got it.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> --
> heikki

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-25 21:55 Ajay Gupta [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-26 16:25 [v13,2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: add support for Cypress CCGx Ajay Gupta
2018-10-26  7:27 Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-26  6:49 Peter Rosin
2018-10-25 21:30 Ajay Gupta
2018-10-25 21:29 Ajay Gupta
2018-10-25  9:26 Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-25  9:26 Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-25  9:07 Peter Rosin
2018-10-25  8:17 Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-24 17:43 Ajay Gupta
2018-10-24  9:25 Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-23 18:56 Ajay Gupta
2018-10-23  9:35 Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-03 18:27 Ajay Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR12MB2727B1FAF918B77A4B88C3DFDCF70@BYAPR12MB2727.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ajayg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.