All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lv, Hui" <hui.lv@intel.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"keir@xen.org" <keir@xen.org>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Duan, Jiangang" <jiangang.duan@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Zhidong" <zhidong.yu@intel.com>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Lv, Hui" <hui.lv@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xen/credit scheduler; Use delay to control scheduling frequency
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:24:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F37CC284376@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4986 bytes --]

The delay method for credit scheduler can do as well as SRC patch (previous one) to gain significant performance boost without obvious drawbacks.

1. Basically, the "delay method" can achieve nearly the same benefits as my previous SRC patch, 11% overall performance boost for SPECvirt than original credit scheduler.
2. We have tried 1ms delay and 10ms delay, there is no big difference between these two configurations. (1ms is enough to achieve a good performance)
3. We have compared different load level response time/latency (low, high, peak), "delay method" didn't bring very much response time increase.
4. 1ms delay can reduce 30% context switch at peak performance, where produces the benefits. ("int sched_ratelimit_us = 1000" is the recommended setting)


Signed-off-by: Hui Lv <hui.lv@intel.com<mailto:hui.lv@intel.com>>
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com<mailto:George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>>

diff -r 1c58bb664d8d xen/common/sched_credit.c
--- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c Thu Dec 08 17:15:16 2011 +0000
+++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c Fri Dec 16 15:08:09 2011 -0500
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ boolean_param("sched_credit_default_yiel
 static int __read_mostly sched_credit_tslice_ms = CSCHED_DEFAULT_TSLICE_MS;
 integer_param("sched_credit_tslice_ms", sched_credit_tslice_ms);

+/* Scheduler generic parameters
+*/
+extern int sched_ratelimit_us;
 /*
  * Physical CPU
  */
@@ -1297,10 +1300,15 @@ csched_schedule(
     struct csched_private *prv = CSCHED_PRIV(ops);
     struct csched_vcpu *snext;
     struct task_slice ret;
+    s_time_t runtime, tslice;

     CSCHED_STAT_CRANK(schedule);
     CSCHED_VCPU_CHECK(current);

+    runtime = now - current->runstate.state_entry_time;
+    if ( runtime < 0 ) /* Does this ever happen? */
+        runtime = 0;
+
     if ( !is_idle_vcpu(scurr->vcpu) )
     {
         /* Update credits of a non-idle VCPU. */
@@ -1313,6 +1321,41 @@ csched_schedule(
         scurr->pri = CSCHED_PRI_IDLE;
     }

+    /* Choices, choices:
+     * - If we have a tasklet, we need to run the idle vcpu no matter what.
+     * - If sched rate limiting is in effect, and the current vcpu has
+     *   run for less than that amount of time, continue the current one,
+     *   but with a shorter timeslice and return it immediately
+     * - Otherwise, chose the one with the highest priority (which may
+     *   be the one currently running)
+     * - If the currently running one is TS_OVER, see if there
+     *   is a higher priority one waiting on the runqueue of another
+     *   cpu and steal it.
+     */
+
+    /* If we have schedule rate limiting enabled, check to see
+     * how long we've run for. */
+    if ( sched_ratelimit_us
+         && !tasklet_work_scheduled
+         && vcpu_runnable(current)
+         && !is_idle_vcpu(current)
+         && runtime < MICROSECS(sched_ratelimit_us) )
+    {
+        snext = scurr;
+        snext->start_time += now;
+        perfc_incr(delay_ms);
+        tslice = MICROSECS(sched_ratelimit_us);
+        ret.migrated = 0;
+        goto out;
+    }
+    else
+    {
+        /*
+         * Select next runnable local VCPU (ie top of local runq)
+        */
+        tslice = MILLISECS(prv->tslice_ms);
+    }
+
     /*
      * Select next runnable local VCPU (ie top of local runq)
      */
@@ -1367,11 +1410,12 @@ csched_schedule(
     if ( !is_idle_vcpu(snext->vcpu) )
         snext->start_time += now;

+out:
     /*
      * Return task to run next...
      */
     ret.time = (is_idle_vcpu(snext->vcpu) ?
-                -1 : MILLISECS(prv->tslice_ms));
+                -1 : tslice);
     ret.task = snext->vcpu;

     CSCHED_VCPU_CHECK(ret.task);
diff -r 1c58bb664d8d xen/common/schedule.c
--- a/xen/common/schedule.c     Thu Dec 08 17:15:16 2011 +0000
+++ b/xen/common/schedule.c     Fri Dec 16 15:08:09 2011 -0500
@@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ string_param("sched", opt_sched);
 bool_t sched_smt_power_savings = 0;
 boolean_param("sched_smt_power_savings", sched_smt_power_savings);

+/* Default scheduling rate limit: 1ms */
+int sched_ratelimit_us = 1000;
+integer_param("sched_ratelimit_us", sched_ratelimit_us);
+
 /* Various timer handlers. */
 static void s_timer_fn(void *unused);
 static void vcpu_periodic_timer_fn(void *data);
diff -r 1c58bb664d8d xen/include/xen/perfc_defn.h
--- a/xen/include/xen/perfc_defn.h      Thu Dec 08 17:15:16 2011 +0000
+++ b/xen/include/xen/perfc_defn.h      Fri Dec 16 15:08:09 2011 -0500
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ PERFCOUNTER(sched_irq,              "sch
 PERFCOUNTER(sched_run,              "sched: runs through scheduler")
 PERFCOUNTER(sched_ctx,              "sched: context switches")

+PERFCOUNTER(delay_ms,              "csched: delay")
 PERFCOUNTER(vcpu_check,             "csched: vcpu_check")
 PERFCOUNTER(schedule,               "csched: schedule")
 PERFCOUNTER(acct_run,               "csched: acct_run")


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 13298 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2011-12-17  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Acy8a1J98NIQa/LRTpOgi509iCZVqg==>
2011-12-17  3:24 ` Lv, Hui [this message]
2011-12-19  8:24   ` [PATCH v2] xen/credit scheduler; Use delay to control scheduling frequency Jan Beulich
2011-12-19 11:32     ` George Dunlap
2011-12-19 12:05       ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-19 13:59         ` George Dunlap
2011-12-19 14:59           ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-19 15:25             ` Lv, Hui
2011-12-19 15:38               ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-19 16:48                 ` George Dunlap
2011-12-19 17:04                   ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-19 13:56     ` Lv, Hui
2011-12-19 10:54   ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F37CC284376@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=hui.lv@intel.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jiangang.duan@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=zhidong.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.