> On 22 Feb 2018, at 12.10, Matias Bjørling wrote: > > On 02/22/2018 11:25 AM, Javier Gonzalez wrote: >>> On 22 Feb 2018, at 10.39, Matias Bjørling wrote: >>> >>> On 02/22/2018 08:47 AM, Javier Gonzalez wrote: >>>>> On 22 Feb 2018, at 08.28, Matias Bjørling wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 02/21/2018 10:26 AM, Javier González wrote: >>>>>> Both 1.2 and 2.0 specs define a field for media and controller >>>>>> capabilities. Also, 1.2 defines a separate field dedicated to device >>>>>> capabilities. >>>>>> In 2.0 sysfs, this values have been mixed. Revert them to the right >>>>>> value. >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier González >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c | 18 +++++++++--------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c b/drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c >>>>>> index 969bb874850c..598abba66f52 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c >>>>>> @@ -914,8 +914,8 @@ static ssize_t nvm_dev_attr_show(struct device *dev, >>>>>> if (strcmp(attr->name, "version") == 0) { >>>>>> return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", dev_geo->ver_id); >>>>>> - } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "capabilities") == 0) { >>>>>> - return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", dev_geo->c.cap); >>>>>> + } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "media_capabilities") == 0) { >>>>>> + return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", dev_geo->c.mccap); >>>>>> } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "read_typ") == 0) { >>>>>> return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", dev_geo->c.trdt); >>>>>> } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "read_max") == 0) { >>>>>> @@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ static ssize_t nvm_dev_attr_show_12(struct device *dev, >>>>>> return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", dev_geo->c.tbem); >>>>>> } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "multiplane_modes") == 0) { >>>>>> return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08x\n", dev_geo->c.mpos); >>>>>> - } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "media_capabilities") == 0) { >>>>>> - return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08x\n", dev_geo->c.mccap); >>>>>> + } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "capabilities") == 0) { >>>>>> + return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08x\n", dev_geo->c.cap); >>>>>> } else if (strcmp(attr->name, "max_phys_secs") == 0) { >>>>>> return scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", NVM_MAX_VLBA); >>>>>> } else { >>>>>> @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static ssize_t nvm_dev_attr_show_20(struct device *dev, >>>>>> /* general attributes */ >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_RO(version); >>>>>> -static NVM_DEV_ATTR_RO(capabilities); >>>>>> +static NVM_DEV_ATTR_RO(media_capabilities); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_RO(read_typ); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_RO(read_max); >>>>>> @@ -1080,12 +1080,12 @@ static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(prog_max); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(erase_typ); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(erase_max); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(multiplane_modes); >>>>>> -static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(media_capabilities); >>>>>> +static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(capabilities); >>>>>> static NVM_DEV_ATTR_12_RO(max_phys_secs); >>>>>> static struct attribute *nvm_dev_attrs_12[] = { >>>>>> &dev_attr_version.attr, >>>>>> - &dev_attr_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> + &dev_attr_media_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_vendor_opcode.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_device_mode.attr, >>>>>> @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static struct attribute *nvm_dev_attrs_12[] = { >>>>>> &dev_attr_erase_typ.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_erase_max.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_multiplane_modes.attr, >>>>>> - &dev_attr_media_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> + &dev_attr_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_max_phys_secs.attr, >>>>>> NULL, >>>>>> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static NVM_DEV_ATTR_20_RO(reset_max); >>>>>> static struct attribute *nvm_dev_attrs_20[] = { >>>>>> &dev_attr_version.attr, >>>>>> - &dev_attr_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> + &dev_attr_media_capabilities.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_groups.attr, >>>>>> &dev_attr_punits.attr, >>>>> >>>>> With the mccap changes, it should make sense to keep the capabilities >>>>> as is. >>>> The change adds mccap, but sysfs points to cap, which is wrong. This >>>> patch is needed. Otherwise, we change the name of mccap to cap, which >>>> is _very_ confusing to people familiar to both specs. We can change >>>> the name of mccap to cap in a future spec revision. >>>> Javier >>> >>> Think of the sysfs capabilities as an abstract value that defines generic capabilities. It is not directly tied to either 1.2 or 2.0. >> I’m thinking about the user looking at sysfs and at the spec at the same time - I myself get confused when names don’t match. >> Anyway, I’ll keep it the way it was and add a comment for clarification. Would that work for you? > > That works. One may also wait until it is going to be used, e.g., when > vector copy is implemented. Then it's natural to revisit. Ok. Let's do that then. I'll drop the 2 patches then. Javier