From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: xensource (pci) device id's? Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:17:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Zulauf, John" , Xen devel list Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Gerd is suggesting rewriting the subvendor id, which is typically not used as part of the driver match. In fact subvendor info is a bit ad hoc really (although it isn't supposed to be). -- Keir On 1/2/07 20:02, "Zulauf, John" wrote: > > If we change all the PCI vendor ID's for the virtualized devices, how > will the OS find the correct driver in standard HVM systems? > > John Zulauf > > * comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion of my employer * > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Gerd > Hoffmann > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:30 AM > To: Ian Campbell > Cc: Xen devel list > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xensource (pci) device id's? > > Ian Campbell wrote: >> This was the id we used as a placeholder before we got the official >> assignment. >> >> We now have vendor 5853 officially assigned. >> http://pci-ids.ucw.cz/iii/?i=5853 > > Ok, how device IDs are allocated? I'd like to use them to tag virtual > devices ... > > cheers, > Gerd > > btw: I guess usb and pci vendor ids are not the same namespace?