On 20/2/07 19:00, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I saw that sha_copy is used and a copy is being made of the shared entry. Is
> the copy necessary considering that there's a spinlock or could we not rather
> use a pointer? 

Why are you looking at the shared grant table at all, when itıs the active
table that tells you with certainty which grant entries are in use?

 -- Keir