From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Xie, Huawei" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] vhost: Add VHOST PMD Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:25:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1440993326-21205-2-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <1445507150-1481-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <1445507150-1481-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com" To: Tetsuya Mukawa , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Loftus, Ciara" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D453A8E70 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:25:22 +0100 (CET) Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/22/2015 5:48 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:=0A= > The patch introduces a new PMD. This PMD is implemented as thin wrapper= =0A= > of librte_vhost. It means librte_vhost is also needed to compile the PMD.= =0A= > The vhost messages will be handled only when a port is started. So start= =0A= > a port first, then invoke QEMU.=0A= Hi Tetsuya:=0A= I haven't got bandwidth to review the details of this patch but i think=0A= it is the very right thing to do. It is still RFC patch.Is your goal to=0A= make it into 2.2?=0A= =0A=