From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QyIaV-0001pJ-57 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:18:23 +0200 Received: by wwe32 with SMTP id 32so5196005wwe.24 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.203.79 with SMTP id e57mr436589weo.42.1314688410157; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.96] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q19sm833873wec.42.2011.08.30.00.13.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:13:25 +0200 Message-Id: References: <1314598341-2793-1-git-send-email-joelagnel@ti.com> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: "Kridner, Jason" Subject: Re: [RFC oe-core] mkcard: Add a script to parition and format an SD Card X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:18:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 30 aug. 2011, om 01:08 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende = geschreven: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Jason Kridner = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> This script is BSP specific and shouldn't live in the OE-core = layer. >>>>=20 >>>> The only issue is this script is used from within the = IMAGE_CMD_sdimg >>>> code which lives in OE-core (meta/classes/image_types. >>>=20 >>> classes shouldn't be calling external scripts >>>=20 >>=20 >> Is the right approach to add parameters to the IMAGE_CMD_sdimg class >> such that it can be used generically to produce SD card images, >> instead of trying to move this to meta-ti? Should it perhaps be a = bit >> closer to what is being done by the Linaro image tools [1]? >>=20 >> [1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Source/ImageBuilding >>=20 >=20 > Don't the Linaro scripts need to run on the target? Does it fit well > with OE(-core) ? >=20 > I took lot of pain to write it for OE and its almost done, so suggest > we use my method atleast for a few days ;-) I'm immune to the "but I spent a lot of time on this" type of arguments=