From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mohammed, Afzal" Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 10/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: waitpin helper Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:48:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4FD6783D.9030208@ti.com> <4FD78748.2080504@ti.com> <4FD8B55E.6010701@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:56940 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754569Ab2FNIsJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 04:48:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FD8B55E.6010701@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Hunter, Jon" Cc: "tony@atomide.com" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Hi Jon, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:14:30, Hunter, Jon wrote: > On 06/13/2012 02:37 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > In that case we would be directly depending on user flag whose value may > > or may not change and I don't think it is good to directly depend on it > > for waitpin # calculation. > > You are already dependent on it. In other words, you are going to set What I meant is we are not dependent on absolute value of flag to find waitpin, and I disagree in depending on its absolute value, which can change, while flag would be the same. Regards Afzal From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afzal@ti.com (Mohammed, Afzal) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:48:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 10/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: waitpin helper In-Reply-To: <4FD8B55E.6010701@ti.com> References: <4FD6783D.9030208@ti.com> <4FD78748.2080504@ti.com> <4FD8B55E.6010701@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jon, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:14:30, Hunter, Jon wrote: > On 06/13/2012 02:37 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > In that case we would be directly depending on user flag whose value may > > or may not change and I don't think it is good to directly depend on it > > for waitpin # calculation. > > You are already dependent on it. In other words, you are going to set What I meant is we are not dependent on absolute value of flag to find waitpin, and I disagree in depending on its absolute value, which can change, while flag would be the same. Regards Afzal