From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mohammed, Afzal" Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 07/10] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: generic timing calculation Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:21:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83b963e4ebcc1009a26a8c6419c785ac6d742c0b.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com> <50359C64.40603@ti.com> <503BD8D5.5060400@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:57592 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751366Ab2H1MVM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:21:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <503BD8D5.5060400@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Hunter, Jon" Cc: "tony@atomide.com" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Hi Jon, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:00:13, Hunter, Jon wrote: > On 08/27/2012 05:37 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > And at least for initial users, they are expected to have > > some grasp on how to calculate timings, such a user will > > not be much worried about your 3 concerns above, anyway as > > of now they need to have a good grasp on it. > > I would consider myself to be an initial user and I am concerned, > doesn't that count? Yes sir, what I meant was new users who want to have runtime calculation using the generic timing routine. For the peripherals already making use of custom timing routine, I am into that role too, hence the patches 8-10. And if you have any board that makes use of existing custom timing calculation routines (OneNAND, tusb6010 or smc91x), can you please give this series a try. Regards Afzal From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afzal@ti.com (Mohammed, Afzal) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:21:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v6 07/10] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: generic timing calculation In-Reply-To: <503BD8D5.5060400@ti.com> References: <83b963e4ebcc1009a26a8c6419c785ac6d742c0b.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com> <50359C64.40603@ti.com> <503BD8D5.5060400@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jon, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:00:13, Hunter, Jon wrote: > On 08/27/2012 05:37 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > And at least for initial users, they are expected to have > > some grasp on how to calculate timings, such a user will > > not be much worried about your 3 concerns above, anyway as > > of now they need to have a good grasp on it. > > I would consider myself to be an initial user and I am concerned, > doesn't that count? Yes sir, what I meant was new users who want to have runtime calculation using the generic timing routine. For the peripherals already making use of custom timing routine, I am into that role too, hence the patches 8-10. And if you have any board that makes use of existing custom timing calculation routines (OneNAND, tusb6010 or smc91x), can you please give this series a try. Regards Afzal