From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mohammed, Afzal" Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing calculation Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 05:34:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20120824194630.GU11011@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:42366 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754327Ab2ICFeU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 01:34:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Hunter, Jon" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Hi Tony, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > This hangs n800 during the boot. > > Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10, > but with the other patches in this series ? > > As per the board file, n800 has tusb6010 as well as > OneNAND in sync read & async write mode, was OneNAND > working without 10/10. > > Do you have any idea, which timing could have gone wrong, > can you please sent me DEBUG enabled gpmc log with and > without 10/10. Can you please sent me GPMC DEBUG enabled logs with and without this series. Regards Afzal From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afzal@ti.com (Mohammed, Afzal) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 05:34:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing calculation In-Reply-To: References: <20120824194630.GU11011@atomide.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Tony, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > This hangs n800 during the boot. > > Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10, > but with the other patches in this series ? > > As per the board file, n800 has tusb6010 as well as > OneNAND in sync read & async write mode, was OneNAND > working without 10/10. > > Do you have any idea, which timing could have gone wrong, > can you please sent me DEBUG enabled gpmc log with and > without 10/10. Can you please sent me GPMC DEBUG enabled logs with and without this series. Regards Afzal