From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@ti.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing
 calculation
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:50:13 +0000
Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9E253B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
References: <cover.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com>
 <bc000ac53bb1b3ae1a951bbcf372caf6336d2a19.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com>
 <20120824194630.GU11011@atomide.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9BA589@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9DC11D@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9DEC85@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <20120906204354.GJ1303@atomide.com> <20120911184606.GN23092@atomide.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:46795 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752062Ab2ILJuZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 05:50:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120911184606.GN23092@atomide.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>, "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "Hunter, Jon" <jon-hunter@ti.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
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=

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: afzal@ti.com (Mohammed, Afzal)
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:50:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing calculation
In-Reply-To: <20120911184606.GN23092@atomide.com>
References: <cover.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com>
 <bc000ac53bb1b3ae1a951bbcf372caf6336d2a19.1345524670.git.afzal@ti.com>
 <20120824194630.GU11011@atomide.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9BA589@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9DC11D@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9DEC85@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
 <20120906204354.GJ1303@atomide.com> <20120911184606.GN23092@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E9E253B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Tony,

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 00:16:06, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> Here are the timing changes with and without this patch from
> my n800. You can just diff the two files to see some differences.

Hmm.. that was pretty close, OneNAND async,sync as well as
tusb sync values were same.

But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
to get it right.

And thanks for sending me the easily diff-able logs.

Regards
Afzal