From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 04881E00572; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:25:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (rehsack[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98059E00547 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f8so5265470wiw.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:24:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=MVPhwfDsjHkE6jyivQazRg7HYt5RiQCdV57rD2CnHCI=; b=bL/fgbzH6WxT4ev3j6EXydmwBRO4T7CLan4qIIVwHY6ecHC5oHDllPSXqINh//e7CO rv2pyfFT/d6mM8Lc6kuey2EBLxGpD+OYLQ1TXf6SibAJFXJ2CEuvIwSLLZAlbMr/36if C9g0+tEt6m4UCEJ4IvJftzl1i6LCqnredYuIkCmSJLObr1KAoBXkCU7Mosj5JGQjLUS+ 8sa5+m+jVSrJ7AqBLVaPpe+XoF/dez/nmW8ND1gH5tQ44vJPwAiz2YgdS5qlwL7Sma3A z71oHGFqwR+ieWpjV4zbdL/JoyRh6/8w2ckWKJMstJsUflMRp+k7ThF9s87IbMP/kzcK vVXA== X-Received: by 10.180.37.70 with SMTP id w6mr10793410wij.49.1406006692750; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernie.muppets.liwing.de (p578b540c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.139.84.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o2sm49735712wij.24.2014.07.21.22.24.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:24:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Jens Rehsack Message-Id: Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:24:57 +0200 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Right lib-imx/firmware-imx ... versions X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:25:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, as mentioned in my very first post here, we're trying to get a board running with yocto with a bsp for linux-imx-3.0.35_4.1.0 (bdde708). As firmware-imx we have 3.0.35_4.0.0 (tried 3.10.17, too - without difference). When we run xmbc with lib-imx, gpu-viv-ib-mx6q, lib-vpu in daisy versions (3.10.17), xbmc immediately crashes with a segfault in gpu-viv-ib-mx6q (does someone wants the trace?). Using Dora versions (3.10.9) we can at least start xbmc and can start one movie. When we play a second movie, the system crashes with "dma physical memory allocation error" (trace/console output wanted?). The board manufacturer recommends we try the freescale libs (firmware, lib-imx, gpu...) in precisely matching version (3.0.35_4.1.0), but none of them seems to exist in meta-fsl-arm(-extra). That confuses me in the way that I expect, the distributed versions are stable. Though I don't have a concrete question beside "what library versions are good for us?" - any hints, resources to study, ...? Thank you very much. Best regards -- Jens Rehsack rehsack@gmail.com