From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Fix a little mca bug Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:10:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Liu, Jinsong" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" Cc: "Jiang, Yunhong" , "Dong, Eddie" , "Li, Xin" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/05/2011 13:03, "Liu, Jinsong" wrote: > X86: Fix a little mca bug > > At x86_mcinfo_dump(), a little bug at printk information, illusively > indicate an CMCI/POLLED error to a MCE error, this will make debug confusing. Is it correct to have entirely removed the final else clause? -- Keir > Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong > > diff -r 2fe45768d2c1 xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c Tue May 10 13:58:21 2011 +0800 > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c Thu May 19 15:10:07 2011 +0800 > @@ -944,10 +944,11 @@ void x86_mcinfo_dump(struct mc_info *mi) > printk(XENLOG_WARNING > "CPU%d: Machine Check Exception: %16"PRIx64"\n", > mc_global->mc_coreid, mc_global->mc_gstatus); > - } else { > - printk(XENLOG_WARNING "MCE: The hardware reports a non " > - "fatal, correctable incident occurred on " > - "CPU %d.\n", > + } else if (mc_global->mc_flags & MC_FLAG_CMCI) { > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "CMCI occurred on CPU %d.\n", > + mc_global->mc_coreid); > + } else if (mc_global->mc_flags & MC_FLAG_POLLED) { > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "POLLED occurred on CPU %d.\n", > mc_global->mc_coreid); > } >