From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for
	xen-unstable
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:39:27 +0100
Message-ID: <C9FBE74F.2D7EB%keir@xen.org>
References: <1305880090.20576.1.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1305880090.20576.1.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 20/05/2011 09:28, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:

>>  makes we wonder whether we
>> shouldn't simply turn of the unused-but-set-variable warning
>> altogether, or at least not have it be an error. Not the least
>> because I'm not sure it'd be nice to backport all of these changes
>> into older trees (which obviously would suffer mostly the same
>> problems when built with 4.6 or newer).
> 
> Perhaps we should do both -- take the fixes into unstable and disable
> the warning in 4.1?

We should just disable the warning. Job done, don't need to take the uglier
"fixes".

 -- Keir