From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Hunleth Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 10/18] erlang-p1_stun: bump to version 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <20160221001247.1f188600@free-electrons.com> References: <1454443064-14269-1-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <1454443064-14269-11-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <20160220233043.2be4fa0c@free-electrons.com> <20160221001247.1f188600@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:09:20 -0500, Frank Hunleth wrote: > >> Yes, I generally have the same preference. In the Erlang world, the >> style is to use underscores since module names can be represented as >> atoms. In theory, you can quote atoms if you want them to have >> hyphens, but it doesn't look pretty. In the end, I don't think that it >> bothers me either way, so I'm happy to leave it as is. > > Ok, fine. > >> >> config BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_STUN >> >> - bool "erlang-p1-stun" >> >> - select BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_TLS >> >> + bool "erlang-p1_stun" >> >> + select BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_FAST_TLS >> > >> > Build testing has shown that BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_FAST_TLS was not the >> > proper dependency, and instead keeping BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_TLS was >> > the right solution. Could you double check why you switched to >> > fast_tls ? >> >> This was a mistake on my part. I fixed it in a patch that I hadn't >> sent to the list, so thanks for fixing that for me. > > So, is the fast_tls package still useful? No. I'll send a patch that removes it. Frank