From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PLING_QUERY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4FEC433DF for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E4322254 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qfZILCfx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730298AbgJODoS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:44:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42004 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727281AbgJODoR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:44:17 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E76EC061755 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id p15so1631146ljj.8 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HHTEFLARrai9jAcwvYx9rODqAnP/mRVKE4w7Ff4URe4=; b=qfZILCfxkUpQvE6YU3Z9UodjGZTM49N99Qs09Qi/4D5OgMHut9bruj5fsGafj+WSqd IzSk2arafb2CF6N468LF2DMB9Ru6VOsUrx9OcRJnPaGGsxkEQlQEFe5Iruz9ANnaL6qo bFrI68ljv6tVt4AR+c/yd/G4suzPxvqoS+5sfzfdLVbRfwnsTEhIx5p60B2AylA92DYL lKwZtP2S8JaHJAQeuulu5cQ2npU0PtTcVhmbsSsDcsjyI4LIW95dIePKGAen64iJDxMS 7/cvyDiaoN5ikqwUy82WUUjLha/tTcqc+TG96F+SsaIDxH6/WVUQR1Xu7K80mlEnsf3P mf3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HHTEFLARrai9jAcwvYx9rODqAnP/mRVKE4w7Ff4URe4=; b=ttCwmvvPVY3Mu732UAx9nqLfCKjqip2a6v54Gs5T66aWRN2clzPqU0cqchVh0NQXH9 CMman4ZSeco6ZC9zNYLdAEwMhi7yP/Wu6hxmO6qlQd1GvhDnyZnH6b9YWE48GKO648Z1 mizOHHTVI9pJ28etWaylE1h7gq+a3u0r4qnLckcHwyFkortf7wz/k630XV32v4DvXelZ Kxvhj+NOxo2Q9RFS8rNwR2KoMVWOAooQgnJBwIg+6FGXHWe2sPjlZJYPpI2ABVC+suVu JoTq14oXhzbto65O3cyYC73BWwGx8fMLqqKog+QPrOV6JSudOsXoODj526DFhp34Y9Nt tgQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J1okavP0Z9weDRxzCUeqV8p6UyE0Jvbx2pM+lI+bTudS2rddu vubeFOs6xAdwq+OmYOdu+Dd9QvqnWQvmg6FfDzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrojk583U17UFreB26E6EJBzeY9pns7nnbhf5WVPSQWFljj9y5nCaSrAUUweCPWKFxAyW3SN3Koo6Xjpsvyx8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b006:: with SMTP id y6mr419563ljk.462.1602733454595; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47ead258320536d00f9f32891da3810040875aff.camel@redhat.com> <20201012165428.GD26135@linux.intel.com> <20201013045245.GA11344@linux.intel.com> <20201013070329.GC11344@linux.intel.com> <626a8667-be00-96b7-f21d-1ec7648ee1e6@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <626a8667-be00-96b7-f21d-1ec7648ee1e6@redhat.com> From: harry harry Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:43:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks! To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Sean Christopherson , Maxim Levitsky , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com, stefanha@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Paolo and Sean, It is clear to me now. Thanks much for your reply and help. Best regards, Harry From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PLING_QUERY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47901C433DF for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A689D22245 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qfZILCfx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A689D22245 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSuCx-0006Np-JJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:45:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSuBi-0005tN-1D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:44:22 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::242]:39659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSuBd-0003oh-HO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:44:21 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id m16so1644633ljo.6 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HHTEFLARrai9jAcwvYx9rODqAnP/mRVKE4w7Ff4URe4=; b=qfZILCfxkUpQvE6YU3Z9UodjGZTM49N99Qs09Qi/4D5OgMHut9bruj5fsGafj+WSqd IzSk2arafb2CF6N468LF2DMB9Ru6VOsUrx9OcRJnPaGGsxkEQlQEFe5Iruz9ANnaL6qo bFrI68ljv6tVt4AR+c/yd/G4suzPxvqoS+5sfzfdLVbRfwnsTEhIx5p60B2AylA92DYL lKwZtP2S8JaHJAQeuulu5cQ2npU0PtTcVhmbsSsDcsjyI4LIW95dIePKGAen64iJDxMS 7/cvyDiaoN5ikqwUy82WUUjLha/tTcqc+TG96F+SsaIDxH6/WVUQR1Xu7K80mlEnsf3P mf3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HHTEFLARrai9jAcwvYx9rODqAnP/mRVKE4w7Ff4URe4=; b=bNrVGY+J1+aNFom47WQQ6BjQiuuYWxye0LDHmJ3Y/5jNtaThJTFHZbaIxpm3kPLder NXai/81c7FuhlR7f4LcBz1L+6If9/McLPJGz/o6Rhr3JTsBCURuJtR284laySEUUxyO4 F5GP4ro2v8oMgRxRmyjmjpVgC4JYccDCOx5fTHETEW8KzGbF48B0E9Ru9ooyJfImbL3i /zFoNr1DORZyMlo7tY+wSOt9aS8sYRvvVLZcMX6YeSKxw05fL7FilQ4luk1ZCQtYSvBB 305vGzKBGBEUjEGPdJunKOZ4DLKEw9K12G22xVnYDQee69xWZikIvKANB6g9RRenxSVr 9GBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531arfS+Ni0tUoNqSOp+eB49CGJb/Tp25Mkf8h2jsp2s62pp08uw FzUDNtZC+b4VlZQeZqUDBrakyx9/65zdnQpeBOQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrojk583U17UFreB26E6EJBzeY9pns7nnbhf5WVPSQWFljj9y5nCaSrAUUweCPWKFxAyW3SN3Koo6Xjpsvyx8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b006:: with SMTP id y6mr419563ljk.462.1602733454595; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47ead258320536d00f9f32891da3810040875aff.camel@redhat.com> <20201012165428.GD26135@linux.intel.com> <20201013045245.GA11344@linux.intel.com> <20201013070329.GC11344@linux.intel.com> <626a8667-be00-96b7-f21d-1ec7648ee1e6@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <626a8667-be00-96b7-f21d-1ec7648ee1e6@redhat.com> From: harry harry Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:43:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks! To: Paolo Bonzini Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::242; envelope-from=hiharryharryharry@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x242.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sean Christopherson , Maxim Levitsky , mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com, stefanha@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi Paolo and Sean, It is clear to me now. Thanks much for your reply and help. Best regards, Harry