All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Andrey Smetanin <asmetanin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
	Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] KVM: add KVM_EXIT_MSR exit reason and capability.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:58:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+0KQ4P1M6mb8-BtKg9Ss5PRk5ZAqPRLZ1WwkQzuHhHbFturKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567479DE.6010805@redhat.com>

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/08/2015 20:46, Peter Hornyack wrote:
>> Define KVM_EXIT_MSR, a new exit reason for accesses to MSRs that kvm
>> does not handle. Define KVM_CAP_UNHANDLED_MSR_EXITS, a vm-wide
>> capability that guards the new exit reason and which can be enabled via
>> the KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@google.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          | 14 ++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> Let's instead add:
>
> - KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS
>
> - KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXIT
>
> - KVM_CAP_DISABLE_MSR_EXIT
>
> and 3 kinds of exits: KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ, KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE,
> KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE.  The first two use four fields (type, msr,
> data, handled) and #GP if handled=0 is zero on the next entry.  The last
> one uses the first three fields and can be used for HyperV.
>
> Paolo

Paolo, I've included an updated version of this patch below. Does this
match the API that you had in mind? If so, I'll continue adjusting the
rest of the code and will send the entire new patchset.

This updated version of the API seems more cumbersome to me (three new
capabilities, three exit reasons when just one or two might suffice)
than the original interface I used, but maybe you have a good reason
for that. Also, will it be ok to have just one capability to enable
all three kinds of exits, or will KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE want a
separate capability?


commit a684d520ed62cf0db4495e5197d5bf722e4f8109
Author: Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@google.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 18 14:44:04 2015 -0800

    KVM: add capabilities and exit reasons for MSRs.

    Define KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ, KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE, and
    KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE, new exit reasons for accesses to MSRs that kvm
    does not handle or that user space needs to be notified about. Define the
    KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS, KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXITS, and KVM_CAP_DISABLE_MSR_EXITS
    capabilities to control these new exits for a VM.

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 053f613fc9a9..3bba3248df3d 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -3359,6 +3359,43 @@ Hyper-V SynIC state change. Notification is
used to remap SynIC
 event/message pages and to enable/disable SynIC messages/events processing
 in userspace.

+ /*
+ * KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ, KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE,
+ * KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE
+ */
+ struct {
+ __u32 index;    /* i.e. ecx; out */
+ __u64 data;     /* out (wrmsr) / in (rdmsr) */
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_COMPLETION_FAILED 1
+ __u64 type;     /* out */
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_UNHANDLED 0
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_HANDLED   1
+ __u8 handled;   /* in */
+ } msr;
+
+If exit_reason is KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ or KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE, then the vcpu has
+executed a rdmsr or wrmsr instruction which could not be satisfied by kvm. The
+msr struct is used for both output to and input from user space. index is the
+target MSR number held in ecx; user space must not modify this field. data
+holds the payload from a wrmsr or must be filled in with a payload on a rdmsr.
+For a normal exit, type will be 0.
+
+On the return path into kvm, user space should set handled to
+KVM_EXIT_MSR_HANDLED if it successfully handled the MSR access. Otherwise,
+handled should be set to KVM_EXIT_MSR_UNHANDLED, which will cause a general
+protection fault to be injected into the vcpu. If an error occurs during the
+return into kvm, the vcpu will not be run and another exit will be generated
+with type set to KVM_EXIT_MSR_COMPLETION_FAILED.
+
+If exit_reason is KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE, then the vcpu has executed a wrmsr
+instruction which is handled by kvm but which user space may need to be
+notified about. index and data are set as described above; the value of type
+depends on the MSR that was written. handled is ignored on reentry into kvm.
+
+KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ, KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE, and KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE can only
+occur when KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS is present and KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXITS has been
+set. A detailed description of these capabilities is below.
+
  /* Fix the size of the union. */
  char padding[256];
  };
@@ -3697,6 +3734,26 @@ a KVM_EXIT_IOAPIC_EOI vmexit will be reported
to userspace.
 Fails if VCPU has already been created, or if the irqchip is already in the
 kernel (i.e. KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP has already been called).

+7.6 KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXITS, KVM_CAP_DISABLE_MSR_EXITS
+
+Architectures: x86 (vmx-only)
+Parameters: none
+Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
+
+These capabilities enable and disable exits to user space for certain guest MSR
+accesses. These capabilities are only available if KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION
+indicates that KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS is present.
+
+When enabled, kvm will exit to user space when the guest reads
+an MSR that kvm does not handle (KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ), writes an MSR that kvm
+does not handle (KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE), or writes an MSR that kvm handles but for
+which user space should be notified (KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE).
+
+These exits are currently only implemented for vmx. Also, note that if the kvm
+module's ignore_msrs flag is set then KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ and KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE
+will not be generated, and unhandled MSR accesses will simply be ignored and
+the guest re-entered immediately.
+

 8. Other capabilities.
 ----------------------
@@ -3726,3 +3783,11 @@ In order to use SynIC, it has to be activated
by setting this
 capability via KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl on the vcpu fd. Note that this
 will disable the use of APIC hardware virtualization even if supported
 by the CPU, as it's incompatible with SynIC auto-EOI behavior.
+
+8.3 KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS
+
+Architectures: x86 (vmx-only)
+
+This capability, if KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION indicates that it is available, means
+that the kernel implements the KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXITS and
+KVM_CAP_DISABLE_MSR_EXITS capabilities for VMs.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 6e32f7599081..431fd1ec0d06 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ struct kvm_hyperv_exit {
 #define KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI        25
 #define KVM_EXIT_IOAPIC_EOI       26
 #define KVM_EXIT_HYPERV           27
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ         28
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE        29
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE  30

 /* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
 /* Emulate instruction failed. */
@@ -355,6 +358,18 @@ struct kvm_run {
  } eoi;
  /* KVM_EXIT_HYPERV */
  struct kvm_hyperv_exit hyperv;
+ /*
+ * KVM_EXIT_MSR_READ, KVM_EXIT_MSR_WRITE,
+ * KVM_EXIT_MSR_AFTER_WRITE
+ */
+ struct {
+ __u32 index;    /* i.e. ecx; out */
+ __u64 data;     /* out (wrmsr) / in (rdmsr) */
+ __u64 type;     /* out */
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_UNHANDLED 0
+#define KVM_EXIT_MSR_HANDLED   1
+ __u8 handled;   /* in */
+ } msr;
  /* Fix the size of the union. */
  char padding[256];
  };
@@ -849,6 +864,9 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
 #define KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP 121
 #define KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD_ANY_LENGTH 122
 #define KVM_CAP_HYPERV_SYNIC 123
+#define KVM_CAP_MSR_EXITS 124
+#define KVM_CAP_DISABLE_MSR_EXITS 125
+#define KVM_CAP_ENABLE_MSR_EXITS 126

 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-21 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 18:46 [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: exit to user space on unhandled MSR accesses Peter Hornyack
2015-08-18 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: refactor vmx rdmsr/wrmsr completion into new functions Peter Hornyack
2015-08-18 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] KVM: add KVM_EXIT_MSR exit reason and capability Peter Hornyack
2015-12-18 21:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-18 23:56     ` Peter Hornyack
2015-12-21 18:58     ` Peter Hornyack [this message]
2015-12-22  7:24       ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-22 12:01         ` 'Roman Kagan'
2015-12-22 12:51           ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-22 14:09             ` 'Roman Kagan'
2015-12-23  7:47               ` Pavel Fedin
2016-01-12  3:21         ` Peter Hornyack
2015-08-18 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: add msr_exits_supported to kvm_x86_ops Peter Hornyack
2015-08-24 23:15   ` Bandan Das
2015-08-18 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: enable unhandled MSR exits for vmx Peter Hornyack
2015-08-24 23:14   ` Bandan Das
2015-08-18 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: add trace events for unhandled MSR exits Peter Hornyack
2015-08-19 21:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: exit to user space on unhandled MSR accesses Bandan Das
2015-08-20 19:40   ` Peter Hornyack
2015-08-24 23:21     ` Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+0KQ4P1M6mb8-BtKg9Ss5PRk5ZAqPRLZ1WwkQzuHhHbFturKg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peterhornyack@google.com \
    --cc=asmetanin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.