All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
       [not found] <CA+2rt42Z+8Bg9wh=LPphQKBOV6Rxgpm7D8LdKOOq7_X6GVOKxw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2012-04-12 19:22 ` Sheng Yang
  2012-04-13  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sheng Yang @ 2012-04-12 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel, keir, jeremy


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4486 bytes --]

(Sorry for duplicate mail, got a typo in the mailing list address...)

Hi,

Recently we got some reports of Debian(2.6.32-41 package) migration hang on
some certain machines. I've identified one issue in Xen, but I think there
is probably another issue in the kernel.

Here is the case.

[    0.000000] Booting paravirtualized kernel on Xen



[    0.000000] Xen version: 3.4.2 (preserve-AD)



[    0.000000] NR_CPUS:32 nr_cpumask_bits:32 nr_cpu_ids:1 nr_node_ids:1



[    0.000000] PERCPU: Embedded 15 pages/cpu @c1608000 s37656 r0 d23784
u65536


[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s37656 r0 d23784 u65536 alloc=16*4096



[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0



[508119.807590] trying to map vcpu_info 0 at c1609010, mfn 992cac, offset
16


[508119.807593] cpu 0 using vcpu_info at c1609010



[508119.807594] Xen: using vcpu_info placement



[508119.807598] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.
 Total pages: 32416

Dmesg show that when booting, timestamp of printk jumped from 0 to a big
number([508119.807590] in this case) immediately.

And when migrating:

[509508.914333] suspending xenstore...



[516212.055921] trying to map vcpu_info 0 at c1609010, mfn 895fd7, offset
16


[516212.055930] cpu 0 using vcpu_info at c1609010

Timestamp jumped again. We can reproduce above issues on our Sandy Bridge
machines.

After this, call trace and guest hang maybe observed on some machines:

[516383.019499] INFO: task xenwatch:12 blocked for more than 120 seconds.



[516383.019566] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
this message.


[516383.019578] xenwatch      D c1610e20     0    12      2 0x00000000



[516383.019591]  c781eec0 00000246 c1610e58 c1610e20 c781f300 c1441e20
c1441e20 001cf000


[516383.019605]  c781f07c c1610e20 00000000 00000001 c1441e20 c62e01c0
c1610e20 c62e01c0


[516383.019617]  c127e18e c781f07c c7830020 c7830020 c1441e20 c1441e20
c127f2f1 c781f080


[516383.019629] Call Trace:



[516383.019640]  [<c127e18e>] ? schedule+0x78f/0x7dc



[516383.019645]  [<c127f2f1>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd/0xf



[516383.019649]  [<c127e4a1>] ? schedule_timeout+0x20/0xb0



[516383.019656]  [<c100573c>] ? xen_force_evtchn_callback+0xc/0x10



[516383.019660]  [<c127e3aa>] ? wait_for_common+0xa4/0x100



[516383.019665]  [<c1033315>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x8



[516383.019671]  [<c104a144>] ? kthread_stop+0x4f/0x8e



[516383.019675]  [<c1047883>] ? cleanup_workqueue_thread+0x3a/0x45



[516383.019679]  [<c1047903>] ? destroy_workqueue+0x56/0x85



[516383.019684]  [<c106a395>] ? stop_machine_destroy+0x23/0x37



[516383.019690]  [<c11962d8>] ? shutdown_handler+0x200/0x22f



[516383.019694]  [<c1197439>] ? xenwatch_thread+0xdc/0x103



[516383.019698]  [<c104a322>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d



[516383.019701]  [<c119735d>] ? xenwatch_thread+0x0/0x103



[516383.019705]  [<c104a0f0>] ? kthread+0x61/0x66



[516383.019709]  [<c104a08f>] ? kthread+0x0/0x66



[516383.019714]  [<c1008d87>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10

But I cannot reproduce it call trace and hang on our Sandy Bridge.

I've spent some time to identify the timestamp jump issue, and
finally found it's due to Invarient TSC (CPUID Leaf 0x80000007 EDX:8, also
called non-stop TSC). The present of the feature would enable a parameter
in the kernel named: sched_clock_stable. Seems this parameter is unable to
work with Xen's pvclock. If sched_clock_stable() is set, value returned by
xen_clocksource_read() would be returned as sched_clock_cpu() directly, but
CMIIW the value returned by xen_clocksource_read() is based on host(vcpu)
uptime rather than this VM's uptime, then result in the timestamp jump.

I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
trace and guest hang issue as well.

Attachment is a (untested) patch to mask the CPUID leaf 0x80000007. I think
the issue can be easily reproduced using a Westmere or SandyBridge
machine(my old colleagues at Intel said the feature likely existed after
Nehalem) running newer version of PV guest, check the guest cpuinfo you
would see nonstop_tsc, and you would notice the abnormal timestamp of
printk.

Sorry I don't have a Xen unstable environment by hand now. But I think this
should be the case we saw.

BTW: the original environment is xen-3.4.2, but I found the feature remain
unmasked by latest xen-unstable tree.

--
regards
Yang, Sheng




-- 
--
regards
Yang, Sheng

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 11730 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-libxc-disable-invarient-TSC-for-PV-guest.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2759 bytes --]

From a800089bc7c05081a4d2f09ea86eae52eca5ab7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:47:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] libxc: disable invarient TSC for PV guest

We got the following dmesg in the Debian 6.0's latest kernels(debian package
2.6.32-41, and 3.2.0-2), running as PV guest on invarient(non-stop) TSC capable
machine.

Booting:

[    0.000000] Xen version: 3.4.2 (preserve-AD)
[    0.000000] NR_CPUS:32 nr_cpumask_bits:32 nr_cpu_ids:1 nr_node_ids:1
[    0.000000] PERCPU: Embedded 15 pages/cpu @c1608000 s37656 r0 d23784 u65536
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s37656 r0 d23784 u65536 alloc=16*4096
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0
[508119.807590] trying to map vcpu_info 0 at c1609010, mfn 992cac, offset 16
[508119.807593] cpu 0 using vcpu_info at c1609010
[508119.807594] Xen: using vcpu_info placement
[508119.807598] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 32416

Time jumped from [0.000000] to [508119.807590].

Migration:

[508125.141300] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
[508135.385854] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[508135.745863] eth1: no IPv6 routers present
[509508.914333] suspending xenstore...
[516212.055921] trying to map vcpu_info 0 at c1609010, mfn 895fd7, offset 16
[516212.055930] cpu 0 using vcpu_info at c1609010

Time jumped from [509508.914333](before migration) to [516212.055921](after
migration).

The above issue can be reproduced using our SandyBridge machine.

After investigation, I found it's due to Invarient TSC (CPUID Leaf 0x80000007
EDX:8, also called non-stop TSC). The present of the feature would enable a
parameter in the kernel named: sched_clock_stable.  Seems this parameter is
unable to work with Xen's pvclock.

The patch would disable non-stop TSC for PV guest, thus fix this timestamp
issue.

This issue potentially caused guest hang when running with debian kernel
2.6.32-41, but we cannot reproduce the hang in our environment. There are maybe
other kernel bugs there.

Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@citrix.com>
---
 tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
index 0882ce6..a028407 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static void xc_cpuid_pv_policy(
     case 0x00000005: /* MONITOR/MWAIT */
     case 0x0000000a: /* Architectural Performance Monitor Features */
     case 0x0000000b: /* Extended Topology Enumeration */
+    case 0x80000007: /* Invariant TSC */
     case 0x8000000a: /* SVM revision and features */
     case 0x8000001b: /* Instruction Based Sampling */
     case 0x8000001c: /* Light Weight Profiling */
-- 
1.7.5.4


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-12 19:22 ` Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest Sheng Yang
@ 2012-04-13  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
  2012-04-13 10:37     ` David Vrabel
  2012-04-13 17:27     ` Sheng Yang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2012-04-13  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sheng Yang; +Cc: jeremy, keir, xen-devel

>>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
> timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
> trace and guest hang issue as well.

And this is also how it should be fixed.

> Attachment is a (untested) patch to mask the CPUID leaf 0x80000007. I think
> the issue can be easily reproduced using a Westmere or SandyBridge
> machine(my old colleagues at Intel said the feature likely existed after
> Nehalem) running newer version of PV guest, check the guest cpuinfo you
> would see nonstop_tsc, and you would notice the abnormal timestamp of
> printk.

Masking the entire leaf is certainly out of question. And even masking
the individual bit is questionable - a PV kernel simply shouldn't look at
it imo (for other than possibly reporting to user mode purposes).

Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-13  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
@ 2012-04-13 10:37     ` David Vrabel
  2012-04-13 11:00       ` Jan Beulich
  2012-04-13 17:27     ` Sheng Yang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2012-04-13 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Sheng Yang, jeremy, keir, xen-devel

On 13/04/12 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>> I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
>> timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
>> trace and guest hang issue as well.
> 
> And this is also how it should be fixed.

Something like this?  I've not tested it yet as I need to track down
some of the problem hardware and get it set up.

8<---------------
xen: always set the sched clock as unstable

It's not clear to me if the Xen clock source can be used as a stable
sched clock. Also, even if the guest is started on a system whose
underying TSC is stable it may be migrated to one where it's not. So
never mark the sched clock as stable.

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/time.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index 0296a95..b22cd9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
 	do_settimeofday(&tp);

 	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
+	sched_clock_stable = 0;

 	xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
 	xen_setup_timer(cpu);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-13 10:37     ` David Vrabel
@ 2012-04-13 11:00       ` Jan Beulich
  2012-04-13 16:10         ` David Vrabel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2012-04-13 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Vrabel; +Cc: Sheng Yang, jeremy, keir, xen-devel

>>> On 13.04.12 at 12:37, David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net> wrote:
> On 13/04/12 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>> I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
>>> timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
>>> trace and guest hang issue as well.
>> 
>> And this is also how it should be fixed.
> 
> Something like this?  I've not tested it yet as I need to track down
> some of the problem hardware and get it set up.

Yeah, except that I'm not sure you really need to clear the feature
flags. Just making sure sched_clock_stable never gets set should be
enough; playing with the feature flags always implies that users will
see bigger differences in /proc/cpuinfo between native and Xen
kernels...

Jjan

> 8<---------------
> xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
> 
> It's not clear to me if the Xen clock source can be used as a stable
> sched clock. Also, even if the guest is started on a system whose
> underying TSC is stable it may be migrated to one where it's not. So
> never mark the sched clock as stable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/time.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> index 0296a95..b22cd9c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>  	do_settimeofday(&tp);
> 
>  	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
> +	sched_clock_stable = 0;
> 
>  	xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>  	xen_setup_timer(cpu);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-13 11:00       ` Jan Beulich
@ 2012-04-13 16:10         ` David Vrabel
  2012-04-13 16:15           ` Sheng Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2012-04-13 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Sheng Yang, jeremy, keir, xen-devel

On 13/04/12 12:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.04.12 at 12:37, David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net> wrote:
>> On 13/04/12 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>>> I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
>>>> timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
>>>> trace and guest hang issue as well.
>>>
>>> And this is also how it should be fixed.
>>
>> Something like this?  I've not tested it yet as I need to track down
>> some of the problem hardware and get it set up.
> 
> Yeah, except that I'm not sure you really need to clear the feature
> flags. Just making sure sched_clock_stable never gets set should be
> enough; playing with the feature flags always implies that users will
> see bigger differences in /proc/cpuinfo between native and Xen
> kernels...

I have a system with both NONSTOP_TSC and CONSTANT_TSC so
sched_clock_stable should be true.  VMs start and migrate fine with no
unexpected jumps in time.  I think more digging is required here to find
out why time is screwy on this particular system.

David

>> 8<---------------
>> xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
>>
>> It's not clear to me if the Xen clock source can be used as a stable
>> sched clock. Also, even if the guest is started on a system whose
>> underying TSC is stable it may be migrated to one where it's not. So
>> never mark the sched clock as stable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/xen/time.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> index 0296a95..b22cd9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>>  	do_settimeofday(&tp);
>>
>>  	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
>> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
>> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
>> +	sched_clock_stable = 0;
>>
>>  	xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>>  	xen_setup_timer(cpu);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-13 16:10         ` David Vrabel
@ 2012-04-13 16:15           ` Sheng Yang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sheng Yang @ 2012-04-13 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Vrabel; +Cc: jeremy, keir, Jan Beulich, xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2619 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:10 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>wrote:

> On 13/04/12 12:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 13.04.12 at 12:37, David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net> wrote:
> >> On 13/04/12 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> >>>> I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
> >>>> timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the
> call
> >>>> trace and guest hang issue as well.
> >>>
> >>> And this is also how it should be fixed.
> >>
> >> Something like this?  I've not tested it yet as I need to track down
> >> some of the problem hardware and get it set up.
> >
> > Yeah, except that I'm not sure you really need to clear the feature
> > flags. Just making sure sched_clock_stable never gets set should be
> > enough; playing with the feature flags always implies that users will
> > see bigger differences in /proc/cpuinfo between native and Xen
> > kernels...
>
> I have a system with both NONSTOP_TSC and CONSTANT_TSC so
> sched_clock_stable should be true.  VMs start and migrate fine with no
> unexpected jumps in time.  I think more digging is required here to find
> out why time is screwy on this particular system.
>

That's the reason I said there should be another (kernel) bug, triggered by
this. In the original mail, I've already said on our Sandy Bridge machine,
I can only reproduce the timestamp of printk jump issue, but not the
migration hang.

Did you see the timestamp jump on the PV guest?

--
regards
Yang, Sheng


> David
>
> >> 8<---------------
> >> xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
> >>
> >> It's not clear to me if the Xen clock source can be used as a stable
> >> sched clock. Also, even if the guest is started on a system whose
> >> underying TSC is stable it may be migrated to one where it's not. So
> >> never mark the sched clock as stable.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/xen/time.c |    3 +++
> >>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> >> index 0296a95..b22cd9c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> >> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
> >>      do_settimeofday(&tp);
> >>
> >>      setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
> >> +    setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> >> +    setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
> >> +    sched_clock_stable = 0;
> >>
> >>      xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> >>      xen_setup_timer(cpu);
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest
  2012-04-13  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
  2012-04-13 10:37     ` David Vrabel
@ 2012-04-13 17:27     ` Sheng Yang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sheng Yang @ 2012-04-13 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: jeremy, keir, David Vrabel, xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2190 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 12.04.12 at 21:22, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> > I've compiled a kernel, force sched_clock_stable=0, then it solved the
> > timestamp jump issue as expected. Luckily, seems it also solved the call
> > trace and guest hang issue as well.
>
> And this is also how it should be fixed.
>
> > Attachment is a (untested) patch to mask the CPUID leaf 0x80000007. I
> think
> > the issue can be easily reproduced using a Westmere or SandyBridge
> > machine(my old colleagues at Intel said the feature likely existed after
> > Nehalem) running newer version of PV guest, check the guest cpuinfo you
> > would see nonstop_tsc, and you would notice the abnormal timestamp of
> > printk.
>
> Masking the entire leaf is certainly out of question. And even masking
> the individual bit is questionable - a PV kernel simply shouldn't look at
> it imo (for other than possibly reporting to user mode purposes).
>
> Jan
>
>
The CPUID detection part in the kernel is handled by CPU vendor, not Xen.
And the way how Xen control it is through CPUID it present to the guest.

1. We can only mask one bit of it. But currently this leaf got only this
feature. I don't think it would be a big problem of mask the whole leaf. I
think it's already a problem that Xen handle PV guest a blacklist of cpu
feature rather than a white list, so when some new feature slipped in(like
this time), nobody would know what would happen. I am really thinking of
some thing like:

switch ( input[0] )
case...
case...

+default:
        regs[0] = regs[1] = regs[2] = regs[3] = 0;

Maybe there are some reason that we didn't set a default value for pv cpuid
policy, but I can't see why.

2. If we want to present the cpu feature to the guest and disable that
feature in the guest, then what's the point? I don't think it is a good
idea. What if there are something else interactive with this cpuid feature
but we failed to disable(e.g. something other than sched_clock_stable)?
Just don't show it would be a better/cleaner way to do it, as long as we
agreed this feature is useless even troublesome for PV guest.

--
regards
Yang, Sheng

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2906 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-13 17:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CA+2rt42Z+8Bg9wh=LPphQKBOV6Rxgpm7D8LdKOOq7_X6GVOKxw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-12 19:22 ` Debian stable kernel got timer issue when running as PV guest Sheng Yang
2012-04-13  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-13 10:37     ` David Vrabel
2012-04-13 11:00       ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-13 16:10         ` David Vrabel
2012-04-13 16:15           ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-13 17:27     ` Sheng Yang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.