From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B09C04E53 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2B120862 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KEhZy/OX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2C2B120862 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454D4D69wbzDqMp for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:15:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44; helo=mail-vs1-xe44.google.com; envelope-from=slandden@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KEhZy/OX"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-vs1-xe44.google.com (mail-vs1-xe44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454D1h5XNBzDqBt for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:12:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe44.google.com with SMTP id c24so1197340vsp.7 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:12:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rgZoxbTDVyX84i4y+3LndL3NzVvqWHnpZO7p1jkJ7Ps=; b=KEhZy/OXDTzbadNUidTvFlWZgU8jMoFElzhTBASPTsAPyeHF5qg/2fgL+RWgvkCjBF +bSM4xlnB3fHajXc4oDfg/qLobBEAMgf3KdVTM6uNCZ39rPYSb9AWN6yt9ZsX+aC8P1L 39+4MdHdW9W4Mn6AxpDC6j2guqosV7XrUkdGXTgPJviZYHDAkLEoS4RzUbdBnOyzvk3h 703cKvZjxWJ8VkXBrUeltOhSGnRD1vH9i9w9f0+wB0PVPHHXw5+01IF/izFaFC73142D WyCyQcQMwpIVHGpp8IDhjXIOms1kW5iMmfU8SWp3H9OOWc8PlbnQOzGVZQ2urMAC0O6q Nnyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rgZoxbTDVyX84i4y+3LndL3NzVvqWHnpZO7p1jkJ7Ps=; b=SC4F8iPEV5pJyjvgJABhijEpXY2wR7Y1PKSnlTQQNAesdonzbNIQIuqatE9cm49WU+ hyz2hg8CFl5owP6g410eT8+OoXuafqBMglZTZorsEfxG6YzBkSUoHfuY+yLUi0ruxzKI Q6w9xPML1hb7TXeq7d9OTOyULQSF+iLBIy6bRncgzGhSM6WES40t7qaERFGixSonkWpl aKnihFJdpWrME9NN3gihtb0bB2ba2w7yuLB3vTC1KI591JlJcoyg7+DA5jk6zaBByL6x 3wyFvZ3P1O4rm28t4TyZ1eOt+leeRbiWwXWUWKZ5KXlrUlwAP13zD1pcvubOb4pwqpPE 3GCw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkNH6bIDDekDoQ4PqIlRew8GijQZ8FaYRFurzg+sgyPEt4wSoU HkLA5wCv7ftCPbLlKkU80OX5xoDgTGSzFaMLI2BnGxP0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9XRCuBb7XZsJlDWqUorPr86Kjma7aG6pLne3VW0+QpztgswBChj0kW6h1O8zSuS0d+ohJybCQZyRp9OnOj30= X-Received: by 2002:a67:904:: with SMTP id 4mr3206792vsj.231.1557969171638; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:12:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190513005104.20140-1-shawn@git.icu> <20190515013725.2198-1-shawn@git.icu> <568f62f6-7810-7179-f9aa-03f9df198fb6@c-s.fr> In-Reply-To: <568f62f6-7810-7179-f9aa-03f9df198fb6@c-s.fr> From: Shawn Landden Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 20:12:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/2] [PowerPC] Add simd.h implementation To: Christophe Leroy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:27 AM Christophe Leroy wrote: > Could you please as usual list here the changes provided by each version > to ease the review ? A bunch of embarrassing stuff that caused it not to build on some set-ups (the functions were under the wrong include guards), and I added include guards on simd.h so that you can use may_use_simd() even if you don't have the FPU enabled (ARM's simd.h does this).