From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751934AbcEUCbC (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 22:31:02 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34877 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751647AbcEUCbA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 22:31:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160521004839.GA28231@linux-uzut.site> References: <20160520053926.GC31084@linux-uzut.site> <20160520115819.GF3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160520140533.GA20726@insomnia> <20160520152149.GH3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160520160436.GQ3205@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160520210618.GK3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160521004839.GA28231@linux-uzut.site> Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:30:59 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: q7Pf7zs3ywpVHZuJJSHFDRpYOn4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sem_lock() vs qspinlocks From: Linus Torvalds To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Manfred Spraul , Waiman Long , Ingo Molnar , ggherdovich@suse.com, Mel Gorman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul McKenney , Will Deacon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > I can verify that this patch fixes the issue. Ok, I've applied it to my tree. Linus