From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752449AbcHHSD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:03:57 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:35149 "EHLO mail-oi0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752320AbcHHSDz (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:03:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1470578183-25857-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <1470578183-25857-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:03:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q979Kj5yKPa2m6ePpzSJwzjPr2E Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: fix a bunch of typos To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Sorry for chiming in at the last minute of the MW. > > I am not sure if you like this, but here is a bunch of typo fixes. > All of them are very trivial, but I am afraid this treewide patch is > conflict-prone. The worst part about patches like this is that they are a bitch to check. They're huge and I haev a hard time verifying that the patch does *exactly* what described, and there isn't something else in there hiding. I assume this patch was generated with a script anyway? I'd much rather just re-run the script itself on my tree, and that would make me feel less like I had to review it. So would you mind just sending me the sed-script (or whatever you used) instead? Linus