From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752368AbdLDSC5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:02:57 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:45668 "EHLO mail-it0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751200AbdLDSCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:02:51 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb6L9miYHRkpTLaAnspi0PMpUHi1rjBgK7hM698DHFug9akDrPEYwWckcmOnoe6Vt84RVu5Zh1utkK8tRn2+RE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171204140706.296109558@linutronix.de> References: <20171204140706.296109558@linutronix.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:02:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: p9cW-6EOPq7NGurXJ2AV_lqju1s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 00/60] x86/kpti: Kernel Page Table Isolation (was KAISER) To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Andy Lutomirsky , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , Greg KH , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , Brian Gerst , Josh Poimboeuf , Denys Vlasenko , Rik van Riel , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , David Laight , Eduardo Valentin , "Liguori, Anthony" , Will Deacon , Daniel Gruss Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Kernel Page Table Isolation, prefix kpti_ > > Linus, your call :) I think you probably chose the right name here. The alternatives sound intriguing, but probably not the right thing to do. How much of this is considered worth trying to integrate early? Clearly I'm not taking all of it. Linus