From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756433AbaFYL5s (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:57:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com ([209.85.128.177]:53717 "EHLO mail-ve0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754090AbaFYL5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:57:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140625062510.GB4260@osiris> References: <1403288473.10903.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140623065835.GF19860@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1403622415.15523.4.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140625062510.GB4260@osiris> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:57:45 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UpIYLaYXax6X8Tf0GMonX1lsSeg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax() From: Linus Torvalds To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > Maybe cpu_relax_spin() ? However that doesn't sound much better as well. "cpu_relax_lowlatency()", perhaps? Naming it for what the use is ("relax, but only if you can do it with very low latency") Linus