From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754438AbbHMWyt (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:54:49 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:34339 "EHLO mail-io0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753957AbbHMWyr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:54:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <55CCB510.3060807@redhat.com> <55CD0DAC.9080809@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:54:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0AIqSHpqv5iZUbIgjeJ7LvH4rF0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values wrong in VM? From: Linus Torvalds To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Denys Vlasenko , Kees Cook , David Drysdale , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Will Drewry , Ingo Molnar , Alok Kataria , Borislav Petkov , Alexei Starovoitov , Frederic Weisbecker , "H. Peter Anvin" , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , X86 ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Does the attached patch make sense and work? Btw, I'm not all that happy with it anyway. I still think Denys' patch also potentially changed what audit and strace see for %rax in the pt_regs to -ENOSYS, which I'm not convinced is a good change. But maybe that three-liner patch fixes the immediate problem that David sees. David? Linus